Overreacting to ABC cuts

One would think the Coalition had actually shut the broadcasters’ doors forever

SADLY Tony Abbott’s pre-election pledge to not cut the ABC or SBS budget has sparked a savage reaction to what most analysts would consider to be a justified business adjustment, given the current national economic environment.

Normally, such cuts would be easily defendable considering the ongoing commercial reality many major media outlets have endured in recent years, downsizing and restructuring their organisations with job cuts in the thousands.

But thanks to Mr Abbott’s words, the political and emotional reaction to recent confirmation of the budget reductions - with an estimated 400 job cuts - has been slightly overblown, to say the least.

One would think the Coalition had actually shut the broadcasters’ doors forever and auctioned off their assets at a bargain rate overnight.

“In politics perception is reality and for now the truth is made of plasticine”

But in politics perception is reality and for now the truth is made of plasticine that changes colour to suit its intermittent environment.

Greens communications spokesperson and Western Australian Senator Scott Ludlam was one political commentator who hyperventilated on the issue with more zest than most others this week, having long lost sight of any media market reality.

He even boasted of a special emergency hearing he’ll chair of the Senate Select Committee into the Abbott government's budget cuts – that’s nearly three weeks away – to focus on the cuts.

One hopes he’ll also ask questions about how the ABC will impact commercial activities by seeking to expand online coverage in future, while commercial operators are seeking to monetise internet activities as income from traditional forms of media continues to rapidly decline.

The key question should be asked – is that growing business agenda filling an area of market failure in the Australian media landscape?

“Before the 2013 federal election, Tony Abbott told the Australian public that there would be “no cuts to the ABC or SBS,” Senator Ludlam said.

“Instead, the Abbott government will cut some $327 million in total from the ABC’s budget, and a further $53 million from SBS.”

Shadow communications minister Jason Clare seized the opportunity to sink the boot into the government and score easy political points amid the growing public concern.

“This afternoon Malcolm Turnbull has finally admitted that Tony Abbott lied to the Australian people,” he said.

“On Sky News he said: ‘Certainly there are cuts. He [Tony Abbott] said no cuts to the ABC or SBS. There are cuts to the ABC or SBS’.”

Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon also joined the party in style saying the way things are going under this government, “we will be lucky to have an ABC to save in two years’ time”.

“But we spent a record amount of money on the ABC the last time we were in government,” he said.

“The more the government tried to defend its cuts, the more it seemed they were trying to avoid accountability”

For his part, Mr Abbott said the government was applying an efficiency dividend to the ABC - for the first time in 20 years - to return fire at opposition leader Bill Shorten for prevaricating about any cuts he had in mind for the ABC.

“This just shows that Bill Shorten is all complaint and no solution,” Mr Abbott said.

“He is running a national complaints bureau - he’s not trying to come up with serious credible policies to deal with the issues that are facing Australia right now.”

However, the more the government tried to defend its cuts, the more it seemed they were trying to avoid accountability for the veracity of that pre-election promise and subsequently engaged in a form of verbal gymnastics that would put Nadia Comaneci to shame.

Mr Abbott’s comments have now inevitably been compared to the political credibility suffered by Julia Gillard’s broken promise that there’d be no carbon tax under the government she led, ahead of the 2010 election.

That’s caused a political and emotional freight-train to speed ahead of the government, like the Energizer Bunny on steroids.

Rather than focusing on necessary business efficiencies, the accompanying narrative has escalated to “Save the ABC” with letters written back and forth, petitions signed, and rallies held to accompany a deluge of media reporting.

However, some measured messages have been delivered amongst the chaos, including by ABC managing director Mark Scott who said the changed funding and media environment meant the ABC has had to carefully consider its spending priorities.

Amid the changes, the ABC has also promised a new regional division, to operate from mid-2015 that will harness its “skills, knowledge and infrastructure to better serve rural and regional communities”.

Mr Scott said the ABC “cannot stand still and run the risk of becoming less relevant and compelling to this and future generations”.

“What we are doing today is in the best interests of the ABC and its many stakeholders - it is designed to position the organisation for the future,” he said.

“Change is never easy, but it is almost always necessary”

Another commonsense response came from Victorian Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie who went into bat for regional services, warning any potential cuts in the bush should not come at the expense of bloated metropolitan, centralised services.

“Change is never easy, but it is almost always necessary,” she said.

“The taxpayer spends more than $1 billion a year on the ABC and the taxpayer is entitled to demand value for money.

“However, people are less concerned about the dollar amount given to the ABC and far more interested in the level of service it provides them and their local community.”

Senator McKenzie referred to a speech by Mr Turnbull where he said more “granular detail” was needed on where the ABC spends its money and how that relates to its charter obligations.

“The minister said - ‘the best cure for suspicion is sunlight’ - I could not agree more,” she said.

“Without that sunlight, we are left believing ABC management see regional broadcasting as an annoying distraction from the more exciting areas of prime TV and current affairs and competing in city markets with yet another fabulous brekkie program.

“But it is not good enough: the ABC charter is to be a national broadcaster and not just another Sydney or Melbourne network.

“It is also worth noting the ABC has 45 senior presenters and managers earning more than $200,000 a year, which is more than 10 per cent of their total staff.

“The government is confident there is money available without impacting on programming to meet implementation costs and that the long-term gains from modernising the business far outweigh any one-off implementation costs.

“Considering Mr Scott says savings are coming from back office, there should be no redundancies in regional Australia since ABC workers in regional Australia are all on the front line.

“Whether it is a local weather report, local issues, emergency broadcasting announcements or community events, ABC radio has played a core role in country communities for over 82 years and should not be cut by the board or the managing director.

“While I would urge them to appreciate the important role that the ABC plays in our environmental, economic and social wellbeing, I also absolutely support the government's role in getting the budget under control.”

FarmOnline
Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Qlander
1/12/2014 8:42:55 AM

In it's vindictive attempt to punish perceived coalition supporters in rural Australian. The ABC management has forgotten, that it has already made it's self irrelevant to rural Australian.
EH
1/12/2014 1:59:39 PM

Look, the PM said today that the ABC cuts came as a result of the Labour Government lies about the forecast budget outcome. That deficit forecast or BS guide was nearly 3 times bigger than advised, going from -$17b to nearly -$50b this year alone. On that basis the ABC should have been cut much more deeply. ABC copped a half percent cut while the Government deficit turned out to be +300%. Stop the belly aching. If it were me in charge, I would have cut it back to 1 TV channel &1 radio channel and done away with all the online news medium. If they didn't like that I would sell the lot.
Bushie Bill
1/12/2014 3:08:31 PM

Yes EH, but the wonderful reality is that you never never will be in charge, will you? We are all eternally grateful for that EH because you do appear to be one of our more ignorant rednecks. By the way, Abbott and his bunch of ideological stormtroopers have pushed the deficit to where it is today, way larger than when Labor left government. Did you forget that, EH or was it simply too embarrassing to mention or were you simply ignorant of this simple fact?
Jacky
1/12/2014 5:32:05 PM

Colin, you dont live in the bush. ABC delivers much greater value than Tonys Paid Parental Leave scheme for the rich.
argis
2/12/2014 8:29:46 AM

In case you had not noticed Bushie, your beloved financial slow learners, the Labour/Greens, and a couple of loonie tunes, have blocked every income measure and cost cutting measure brought forward. So not only did they lie to us about the size of the hole they left us in debts, they are still adding to it. Now you are supposedly a man for lowering costs and doing away with regulations in commerce. Why don't you support reducing the cost of the broadcasting services in Australia by selling off Aunty and letting it stand on its own in the real commercial market?
Cam
2/12/2014 1:23:23 PM

So that's it Bill, the Libs have pushed the deficit out. Why don't you tell us why that is Bill. And no, you can't use the "the Libs are economic vandals" or something of the like. You be honest now Bill. Let me give you a hand as we know you are slightly economically challeged, look at argis post, that might steer you in the right direction.
Penina
3/12/2014 5:25:02 PM

I back what Jacky says 100 per cent. The ABC is sometimes the only news/broadcast service available to people in the bush, yet it's the regions that once again will see the cuts.
argis
4/12/2014 7:31:24 AM

Emotive, non factual, irrelevant rubbish Jacky.
Bushie Bill
4/12/2014 3:31:04 PM

Lie 1:"Labour/Greens,... have blocked every income measure and cost cutting measure brought forward".The Opposition has passed $20 billion (about 75%) of the Budget to date. Lie 2: "So not only did they lie to us about the size of the hole they left us in debts, they are still adding to it". The Coalition had exactly the same financial information that the then government did immediately prior to the election (courtesy of legislation introduced by Costello). So I guess it is fair to say (as that old crook Joh used to say) if you tell lies, it is fair to call you a liar, ok?
Bushie Bill
4/12/2014 3:36:49 PM

You got two things right, Cam. "(T)he Libs have pushed the deficit out" and "the Libs are economic vandals". argie old son has proved he is a liar, so give me one good reason why I should take any notice of a liar.
1 | 2  |  next >
A matter of opinionA selection of editorials from around the Fairfax Agricultural Media group covering the issues of the week.

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who