Cronies crushing creativity

Business should never accept help from the government, and GrainCorp’s situation proves the point

FREE market capitalism involves a process known as creative destruction, attributed to the economist Joseph Schumpeter. It refers to the fact that as new competitors and innovations arrive, some businesses fail. The net result is positive, but there can be temporary economic distress such as unemployed workers with obsolete skills and loss of investment by investors and financiers.

Examples include when cars replaced horses, refrigerators replaced ice boxes and Samsung replaced Nokia. Thousands of farriers, ice makers and phone technicians, amongst others, lost their jobs.

Crony capitalism is where success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. Requirements to obtain licences and permits to operate are rife with cronyism, as shown by what is now known about NSW politicians Eddie Obeid and Ian McDonald. Although they are not the same things, crony capitalism is often associated with corruption.

Crony capitalism is never creative. Favoured businesses grow fat and lazy while innovation is stifled. But when the political protection is withdrawn, there can be quite far-reaching destruction.

GrainCorp is a product of crony capitalism. Although its origins were socialist, being originally the government owned Grain Elevators Board, it was privatised in 1998. For the next decade it enjoyed substantial backing from the government and farmer organisations as a monopoly handler of grain on the east coast of Australia. When the single export desk was abolished in 2008, there was still not a single competing export port in NSW or Queensland.

The situation has changed now. Instead of benefiting from government support, it is the government that is holding GrainCorp back. Indeed, it would be much better off in an environment of free market capitalism.

The latest evidence for this came with the recent announcement of the company’s half yearly results, showing profits were substantially down. The company is failing to generate returns above its cost of capital and is likely to close up to 100 of its 280 grain silos in coming months. As I have previously discussed, the funds to repair and retain them are just not available.

While some of the profit decline is attributable to a smaller wheat crop, GrainCorp is also facing increased competition along its logistics network, including its export ports. A new Newcastle terminal, jointly owned by CBH, Olam and Glencore, is now competing alongside GrainCorp’s terminal. Also at Newcastle, a storage facility operated by Louis Dreyfus, with elevation provided by Qube, has been established.

Further competition is set to emerge at Port Kembla, where Qube, Noble Group and Emerald Grain plan to build a 1.3 million tonne capacity grain terminal to rival GrainCorp's facility. Cargill is also apparently involved.

In a free market, some of these players would continue to use GrainCorp’s facilities. The reason CBH, Emerald, Cargill and Louis Dreyfus are looking to take their business elsewhere is because of government intervention, courtesy of the ACCC. GrainCorp is unable to offer them the service they require. It is obliged to offer equal terms to all customers, is prevented from offering special deals like premium shipping slots, its elevation capacity allocation is regulated and it is required to publish reference rates and operating data. Because these restrictions are reviewed annually, it is also unable to enter into long term agreements.

The result is death by a thousand cuts. GrainCorp is prevented from gaining access to ADM’s capital, leaving it financially hamstrung, and unable to be creative because of the regulatory environment. The outlook is not encouraging either. According to one estimate, once the new Port Kembla facility is operational in 2016 there will be 20-25 million tonnes of export capacity on the east coast, to handle an average crop size of 18 million tonnes. It seems likely GrainCorp will be obliged to apply its experience at closing silos to export terminals.

The one ray of light is that the ACCC has just issued a draft ruling that would relieve GrainCorp of these obligations at Newcastle (but not elsewhere). Submissions are invited on this ruling, with CBH lodging a submission in support. Several other market participants have made public comments advocating a free market.

But the legacy of cronyism won’t go away. NSW Farmers, which has substantial clout when it comes to political decisions and was extremely vocal in opposing ADM’s takeover of GrainCorp last year, does not want GrainCorp to be freed of its restraints. It prefers the company’s activities to remain controlled.

The former MP Bert Kelly, who for many years wrote a newspaper column as the Modest Member, said business should never accept help from the government. GrainCorp’s situation proves his point; cronies can be your friend one day and your biggest problem the next.

David Leyonhjelm

David Leyonhjelm

has worked in agribusiness for 30 years and is a Senator for NSW representing the Liberal Democrats.
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


19/05/2014 6:18:23 AM

how can there be a free market when the Anglo-Dutch-Swiss cartel control world food supply/prices? grow eyes in the back of your head, CBH.
John Newton
19/05/2014 6:59:45 AM

Unfettered free market capitalism works brilliantly. Just look at the GFC.
19/05/2014 8:04:04 AM

Where does this guy hide to avoid seeing all the catastrophic fallout of unbridled free-market capitalism and the greed and corruption that goes with it? No room for the vulnerable or lower/middle income earners in his fools' paradise...just there to be worker bees with no quality of life whatever...making mockery of the 'wealth for toil' in our national anthem with this tripe.
on the fence
19/05/2014 8:09:49 AM

All those who killed off the takeover by ADM should be held accountable for the mess that is left behind! By blocking the takeover they effectively assigned Graincorp to the scrapheap along with any value the company held. It will die a slow death to the detriment of the Aust grain industry. ADM should have been allowed to buy this company to improve the processes and invest their $$millions in infrastructure, logistics and market transparency as they proposed.
19/05/2014 9:14:21 AM

What mr Leyonhelm is proposing here is not something that will give growers better returns. what it will lead to is less access up country for growers and/or the necessity for growers to deliver direct to port based on contract . That is to say Graincorp will receive grain for Graincorp , Cargill will only accept grain for Cargill etc and the smaller traders will be left high and dry. So much for transparency and competition. The problem of excess capacity was not created by growers , it is a direct result of deregulation in a market previously focused on exports.
19/05/2014 10:18:57 AM

John how could 'unfettered free market capitalism' have caused the GFC when such a market place did not exist. GFC (credit crunch) had the dirty fingerprints of government regulation, manipulation and crony capitalism all over it.
In Hindsight
19/05/2014 10:25:33 AM

It is an excellent review David. Politics can really muddy the situation and in to the bargain young boys to man the farmer lobby groups top jobs despite the lack of experience. Good regulatory environment can solve the above concerns and still achieve massive new investment that is needed.
19/05/2014 10:26:36 AM

mark2, you make more sense than anyone else in this debate. Having said that, Graincorp has been hamstrung for most of its life by its links with Unionised and Public Service dominated cultures. Despite the same changing marketing environment crashing into CBH, it has managed to adjust much better in serving its customers and remaining viable. It was never constrained like GrainCorp by the Unionised, Public Service culture, but was very closely exposed to the very demanding grain grower community at Director level.
19/05/2014 2:21:56 PM

We did not have a free market the moment we handed over private-currency for Government-monopoly currency. The market has since then been at the knees of Big Government and its inflationary boom and bust cycle. Any economic event post 1910/13 cannot be entirely blamed on the market.
Chick Olsson
20/05/2014 8:30:05 AM

Totally agree David. For years, our family business has tried to use Austrade (Govt ) to help with export but they have consistently proven to be quite useless at anything of value, and we have found it cheaper and more effective just to go it alone.
1 | 2  |  next >
Agribuzz with David LeyonhjelmCommentary, news and analysis with agribusiness consultant David Leyonhjelm. Email David at


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who