Keep the bankers honest

Where is a social license to operate buried in the banking sector’s dazzling mountain of money?

DON Chipp launched the Australian Democrats in 1977 with his now legendary commitment to “keep the bastards honest.”

Readers might claim this catchcry is still a relevant yardstick to measure the current political climate. But it could just as easily be extended to include the Australian banking sector in the 21st century.

Since the deregulation policies of the Hawke government enabled banks to widen their scope, the financial sector has grown into a Goliath of commerce, with an unprecedented stranglehold of the marketplace.

It is estimated the Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, National Australia Bank and ANZ will report combined profits of $29.7 billion this year.

“Increasingly the value of farm production is being significantly outpaced by the levels of farm debt”

For four years in a row, our major banks have recorded better returns than lenders in 10 major developed countries, including Canada, the US, Britain and Europe.

So where is a social license to operate buried among the Australian banking sector’s dazzling mountain of money?

This week I stood on the floor of the Senate chamber and again spoke out about the complacency and arrogance of the banks in refusing to participate in a rural debt survey.

Such a survey would provide a vital platform to understand the true extent of the rural debt problem and enable public policy and social services to be better directed to those who most in need.

The Australian Bankers’ Association has espoused a steady stream of excuses in recent months as to why the banks are refusing to participate in proposed surveys in Queensland and New South Wales.

One of the major complaints is that the process costs the banks too much. It is a disingenuous claim, given the world-beating profits of the bankers.

Equally, it is an offensive statement to the thousands of landholders who are being forced to tighten their belts more and more, with little else than hope and perseverance pushing them to hold on for another week or month.

At a time when Australian agriculture is looking to capitalise on the economic spoils of “The Asian Century,” we find ourselves confronted with a sector hampered by unsustainable debt loads and stagnant earnings.

“Only a pigeon knows how to get to where it is going when it doesn't know where it is”

Australian agriculture is existing in a space where, increasingly, the value of farm production is being significantly outpaced by the levels of farm debt.

In 1980, output per dollar of debt in Australian agriculture peaked at $3.12. By 2010, output per dollar of debt had fallen to just 64 cents.

This debt issue is no more evident than in my state of Queensland where the latest available figures indicate total rural debt is $16.97 billion, more than half of which is with the vital beef sector, which has spent years struggling under drought, flood, fire and the 2011 live export suspension.

The warnings signs are glaringly obvious despite the Australian Bankers’ Association steadfast claims there is no rural debt crisis.

Australian farm debt has increased by almost 75 per cent in a decade - from A$40.3 billion in 2004 to an estimated A$70 billion in 2014.

Land purchase is the largest single contributor to the increases in farm debt over the past two decades.

We are now experiencing the fallout from the “get big or get out” mantra.

Meat and Livestock Australia's recently released Northern Beef Situation Analysis reports that the majority of northern beef producers are not generating profits sufficient to fund current and future liabilities.

The report states that across all 14 regions surveyed - stretching from the Queensland-NSW border to central Western Australia - have reported average business returns of -2.9 per cent between 2010 and 2012.

The double lives the Australian banks are living are coming under increasing scrutiny as the divide between their public façade and their masked intentions begin to show cracks.

Questions have again been raised about honesty and integrity of our bankers with the release last week of a Senate report into fraud, forgery and cover-up in the financial planning division of the Commonwealth Bank.

Away from their public statements of contrition, we can only presume the head honchos at our major banks are reviewing their social license to operate policies.

Admitting there are concerns about rural debt loads and agreeing to assist in a survey would be a reasonable start.

It would provide some direction in the effort to address the current troubles confronting the agriculture sector.

Only a pigeon knows how to get to where it is going when it doesn't know where it is.

Landholders across the nation expect the banks to clear a pathway for a rural debt survey.

And their collective patience, like their capacity to survive this financial crisis, is running thin.

Barry O'Sullivan

Barry O'Sullivan

is a Queensland-based Senator for the Liberal National Party
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


11/07/2014 11:05:58 AM

A question I have is do they have some moral responsibility?. Many of us suspect things are worse than we are told, if that is the case and with the benefit of hindsight they are shown to be worse than the banks are telling us, is there a course for action?. Moral hazard is important, yes people should take responsibility for their actions, however if the data is obscured or misrepresented is there not some responsibility?. At what point is a party responsible for a crime? If they approve loans knowing people have no chance of meeting commitments are they not in some way responsible?
11/07/2014 1:20:09 PM

Thank god for Barry. I can't believe the arrogance of the banking sector paddling the lie that there is no rural debt crisis in Australia. The beef industry in Northern Australia is collapsing and at the first sign of green shoots there will be hundreds of them pushed over by the banks! If Barry can't give Canberra a wake up then none of them deserve to be there!
12/07/2014 7:07:13 AM

WTF, you ask a good question right at the end. How do you, the banks or anyone, know for sure in advance, if people have no chance of meeting commitments? I have no doubt, the Banks are reaping "excessive" profits and will do all they can to protect that status. Isn't it more up to the legislators to set better rules in the finance game so that just like in sport, all players have a better chance of helping the team to win? In this case, the team is Australia. Instead of just a favored few getting all the spoils, we need better rules and maybe better refs too?
14/07/2014 8:10:43 AM

GFA I like no one, have the answers as to how one predicts successors v failures. However if the data says something is wrong, then prospective investors may show more caution. I feel the very existence of their confidence surveys shows this, any Ponzi scheme works on confidence, if investors stop investing it collapses. Real estate prices are just like the the rest of the Ponzi, if people know the figures on bankruptcies are bad we can try to remedy the problems. Not knowing there is a problem only causes more heartache.
Bush mattersBush matters - LNP Senator Barry O'Sullivan tackles the issues facing Aussie primary producers and people across rural and regional Australia.


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who