Concerted effort on mice

MICE. They’re small, fluffy and generally harmless, right? Wrong. In the eyes of many agricultural commentators across south-eastern Australia these rodents have the potential to cause just as much damage as locusts did last year, yet there has been just a fraction of the publicity.

Much of this is a perception thing – there is something innately worrying about a swarm of insects that can devour a crop overnight, and there is no doubt mice damage is more subtle, but farmers need to come out and highlight just how big a deal this mouse plague is.

The response to the locust plague last year was a triumph of co-operation, between the public and private sectors, between states and throughout the general community.

Compare this with what is happening with the current mice plague, where the strain is falling on one beleaguered rodenticide manufacturer to keep up with overwhelming demand.

Rest assured, the blame can’t sit with Animal Control Technologies, who are a commercial business and can’t be caught with a stack of product they can’t move.

There has to be some acknowledgement from the relevant government authorities such as the Australian Pesticide and Veterinary Medicine Authority (APVMA) that a short-term solution has to be found.

Proposals such as upcountry baiting stations, where farmers can bring grain to be treated, are a possibility.

What needs to be knocked on the head is the current unfortunate practice of farmers using off-label concoctions to bait mice.

While we can understand the desperation when there is no bait available, there can be no condoning of using off-label products to treat mice. The products may be effective on mice, but farmers have to realise when using pesticides that there is an entire eco-system to consider. Reports of dead birds are not a good look for a farming industry already fighting an uphill battle on the perception of chemical use.

We urge all interested parties to make it a matter of urgency to ensure a swift and effective response is implemented.

We’ve seen what can be achieved with the locust control effort, it is now just a matter of doing the same thing with mice.

Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Mallee Farmer
30/06/2011 4:25:13 AM

Gregeor, it's not just availability mate, there's a price factor which if you actually researched properly would uncover the extraordinary mark ups and profits which this manufacturer is making, along with the APVMA which also enjoys a nice little piece. Take the time to find out what it might cost to buy zinc phosphide tech and you do the maths. Next to banks there would harldy be another business in the country which would be more profitable than Animal Control Technologies at the moment. We don't want to kill off target species nor ourselves for that matter. Do your homework.

Fair enough, I think its a pretty common sentiment that ACT are having a lash (aside from the fact they wear a carry cost in the years with no mice issues) with the pricing.

However, perhaps more growers should have got in behind the push to get the regional baiting stations in, rather than rushing off and being cowboys with off-label brews. More support would have meant more pressure on government to get them up and running earlier.

The baiting stations are a tad late, but here's hoping they provide an economic and easily available alternative for frustrated farmers.

Posted by moderator: Gregor Heard on 30/06/2011 6:48:39 AM
Grain of TruthRural Press grains writer Gregor Heard on the big issues facing the broadacre farmers today.

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who