Ag's future lies in courageous change

Like consumers, investors will continue to show preference for environmentally friendly products

NO area of our economy, I would argue, is more important to our future wellbeing than the Agriculture sector, but how do we transition to clean, green and ethical?

No sector has so much opportunity on offer, and no sector faces so many challenges in fully capitalising on those opportunities.

Reaping the full benefits of the 'dining boom' will require plenty of strategic planning and intellectual grunt.

We need continued productivity gains but with a stronger emphasis on profitability.

Throughout the 30 years to the beginning of this decade, most of our productivity gains came from our capacity to produce more with less.

This was a largely successful strategy, except that while we greatly increased the volume of production and world trade increased dramatically, profitability actually declined.

There is more we can do on the cost front – infrastructure, transport, reducing red tape, better management, and skilled labour being the standouts.

But future gains in profitability will increasingly come from our capacity to authenticate, verify, consolidate and sustain our clean, green and safe image.

Along with animal welfare assurance, these are the areas which will deliver our capacity to secure premium prices for our products.

On the sustainability front, it is obvious that our long-term prospects will be determined by our climate, the availability of water, and the ongoing quality and productive capacity of our soils.

Our farmers know the climate is changing. While there may still be debate about the causes, there is no doubt our continent is growing hotter and drier.

So we should strive to quickly find a political settlement on carbon mitigation and get on with the challenge which most interests me – adaptation and the application of continuous improvement management systems.

That will be a good thing for profitability, a good thing for resource management, and a good thing for marketing, because if well designed, these systems will verify our clean and green credentials.

Together they will bring more efficient use of scarce water supplies, healthier soils, less fertiliser costs, carbon income, and certify our clean, green safe image.

Both adaptation and environment management systems - EMS - have been with us for some time.

Landcare is now 25 years old and the first Council of Australian Government (COAG) agreed framework for an environmental management system in agriculture was struck in 2002.

But we are at risk of dropping the ball (EMS) seems to have lost political favour and adaptation is at best in a state of flux.

On the latter, recent programs including Caring for Country and Carbon Futures offered real and meaningful incentives, but there is much to learn from those programs.

EMS have been left to the limited number racing ahead of public policy, often guided by non-government initiatives like Certified Land Management.

Those who believe we can meet with success without a greater commitment to adaption and the adoption of better management and certification systems are not yet facing reality.

Not only are consumers - here and abroad - voting with their feet, so too are investors.

Fund managers, for example, are becoming more discerning about where they put their money. Top among the unfashionable are the fossil fuel, nuclear and tobacco sectors.

But agriculture will not be immune. Like consumers, investors will continue to show preference for environmentally friendly products and those who respect the welfare of animals.

The ANZ Bank – Port Jackson Partners Greener Pastures publication suggested that to fully capitalise on the opportunities posed by growing global food demand, we would need $500 billion in infrastructure investment between now and 2050.

Given our population and capacity for savings, much of that investment, by definition, must come from foreign sources.

Rather than put in place more barriers to investment, we need to find better ways of building public confidence.

The real problem is not who or what goes to the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB). Rather, it's that no one knows what the FIRB is or what national interest test it applies.

It’s all too opaque.

Rather than set varying and arbitrary investment thresholds based on country of origin, which only serve to create roadblocks, maybe it's time to more clearly articulate our expectations.

For example, I'm keen for a conversation about a link between foreign investment and environmental outcomes.

Does the investment proposal include a commitment to a credible environmental management plan - a plan to improve water efficiency, soil quality and animal welfare outcomes?

It need not be to be a regulatory burden. Some sectors, including dairy, are well advanced in the development of their own sustainability plans.

In this case, a formal commitment to the industry-wide system would suffice.

This in turn would encourage the development and adoption of more commodity-wide systems - at least among those welcoming of much-needed foreign capital - and make us more attractive to investors who place an emphasis on ethics.

All of these thoughts are challenging but I believe it is the right time for us to be thinking outside the square.

single page
Joel Fitzgibbon

Joel Fitzgibbon

is Shadow Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry & Rural Affairs and the MP for Hunter
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


24/02/2015 3:51:07 PM

there is much in your diatribe Joel that I find annoying, if not offensive....are you suggesting agriculture is not clean green and ethical? Are you mad ? Do you not eat? If you want want you are asking for, are you prepared to pay for it? Will you make sure our competitors exporting food to our shores pass the same test? more importantly will your welfare dependent Labour heartland want to pay for it ? "given our pop'n and capacity for savings..." that really got me, it should've read "our capacity for Govt spending.." that's why we haven't got the capacity to invest, cont
24/02/2015 3:56:01 PM

as I was saying, it's the welfare dependent state that your lot and the Liberal party have created that's cheating us out of a future. I'm a farmer and I'm not going to hang around and cop your clean green ethical carbon friendly utopian fantasyland. If the Labour party gets back into power you can forget about profitability in agriculture.
Out of the shadowShadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon aims to put ag policy under the microscope. Based in the NSW Hunter Valley, Joel also has a unique perspective on the tensions between primary production and mining development.


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who