Deal set to cost wind, solar $6b

19 May, 2015 06:15 AM
A huge weight off the shoulders of the 20,000 people working in the industry

SIX billion dollars in investment in wind and solar power will be lost as a result of a compromise deal on the renewable energy target, energy market analysts say.

Bloomberg New Energy Finance says investment in Australian projects will fall from an expected $20.6 billion by 2020 to $14.7b after the Abbott government and Labor reached a deal to reduce the target.

Monday's agreement, which came after more than 12 months of political gridlock, will slash the original large-scale target of 41,000 gigawatt hours of annual renewable energy production by 2020 to 33,000 gigawatt hours.

Clean Energy Council chief executive Kane Thornton said the expected drop in projects is "what we've had to accept in order to resolve this situation".

"The industry was entirely frozen. There was no new investment if the situation continued," he said.

The government prompted the stalemate when it launched a review of the bipartisan scheme last year, causing the sector a loss of $2b as wind and solar projects stalled under a cloud of political uncertainty.

It originally proposed cutting the target to 26,000 gigawatt hours, while Labor refused to go below a figure of 35,000 to 39,000.

Bloomberg's Australian head Kobad Bhavnagri said the organisation forecast that investment by 2020 would be 29 per cent lower under the new target "but no resolution to the impasse meant the industry was uninvestable".

He warned uncertainty would linger despite the deal as the drawn-out process had demonstrated a bipartisan "legislated policy can be changed. People will continue to talk about policy risk."

Two-year reviews dropped

The government and Labor reached the compromise in Melbourne on Monday after the government agreed to drop a proposal to continue reviewing the target every two years.

Instead, the Clean Energy Regulator will publish an annual statement showing progress toward the target and any impact on electricity prices.

Minutes after the deal was reached, the opposition's environment spokesman Mark Butler declared Labor would increase the 2020 target if it wins the next election and said Labor had begun talks with industry about "a bold, ambitious plan" for Australian renewable energy beyond 2020.

Industry Minister Ian Macfarlane said "we're pleased to have brought this to a conclusion" and the government was looking forward to the clean energy sector "getting out there and meeting a target which means they have to build more renewable energy generation in the next five years than they've built in the last 15".

Legislation to go to Parliament next week will still contain a plan to allow the burning of native timber to count towards the renewable energy target.

Labor, the Greens and the industry oppose this but the government hopes to pass the change with support from the Senate crossbench.

Mr Thornton said restoration of bipartisan support would unlock the sector and some new projects would get underway quickly.

But others could take several months as businesses that had made cuts re-established themselves.

"It has been a tough 15 months, but this development will be a huge weight off the shoulders of the 20,000 people working in the industry," he said.

The Australian Industry Group said the compromise "will lift the cloud on the renewables sector, give a second wind to energy users, and restore a bedrock of policy certainty for business."

But the deal wasn't welcomed by all.

The Greens said the cut was "irresponsible from an environmental, economic and health perspective", while Greenpeace and the Australian Conservation Foundation labelled it "backwards" on climate policy and a win for big polluters.

The Australian Solar Council said 33,000 gigawatt hours "is a bad deal" and there was no argument that supported reducing the target.

Date: Newest first | Oldest first


gary from gawler
19/05/2015 7:10:11 AM

Pre-election Greg Hunt said they wouldn't touch the target. Why do we believe any promises politicians make?
the kid
19/05/2015 8:53:46 AM

Rock and a hard place for Labour. the industry has been suffering while the compromise is reached. Bigger win for big petrochemical/coal giants but no-ones going to be buying our coal soon so its will be a hollow win for them in a few years.
19/05/2015 10:24:47 AM

That 6 billion was to be paid by higher power cost, most of us cannot handle higher costs. It is in many cases now cheaper to run pumps on diesel than electricity. Is this what the clowns want?
19/05/2015 5:46:18 PM

What a great result, they should cut it out all together. If they are profitable, they can still go ahead without govt handouts. Most of the companies involved are overseas owned, the panels and towers are made overseas. Wind power stations destroy the environment for the benefit of foreigners, at the cost to all Australians. A whole industry has grown up out of Govt handouts, lets hope it soon stops. Australia cannot afford to be subsidising foreign owned companies.
Bill Pounder
20/05/2015 1:25:57 AM

If wind and solar are so viable then they should manage without gobbling subsidies. In effect, "renewables" are not industries as such, but a bunch of people sucking the life out of the rest of the real economy and like the whole belief in AGW thing it's a defacto intelligence test to see how dopey people really can be.


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who