Drone 'unethical': NFF

03 Apr, 2013 01:00 AM

THE National Farmers' Federation says moves by Animal Liberation to fly a surveillance drone over cattle and sheep stations, feedlots and other animal production farms to gather and expose animal cruelty evidence, are unethical.

NFF president Jock Laurie said some NFF members were seeking legal advice to determine if the drone could legally collect potentially damning, but isolated evidence of animal mistreatment.

Mr Laurie was speaking in response to news that Animal Liberation had purchased a drone to monitor specific farming operations.

Mr Laurie said any evidence collected unlawfully by the drone would be inadmissible in a court of law, especially if it invaded individual privacy laws.

He was also concerned the noisy drone may operate over the heads of livestock and cause unforseen damage by spooking the animals.

“How far can our industry continue to face this type of harassment? It just doesn’t stop,” he said.

“This is just a step too far - it’s way too much - and surely it breaches ethical boundaries.

“As producers we understand the laws that we have to work within to care for our animals properly every day, like managing heat stress.

“But the last thing anyone wants is to have one of these drones flying over the top of a feedlot or a paddock when we don’t know how the animals will react.”

Speaking to Fairfax Agricultural Media, Animal Liberation NSW executive director Mark Pearson said his group recently purchased a six propeller, Hexacopter drone from German company CineStar for $14,000 that they would start using this week on specific surveillance targets.

He said an extremely powerful camera was attached to the remote controlled drone and could zoom in long distances to obtain detailed film images and still framed photographs.

Mr Pearson said his group’s legal advice indicated the drone was okay if it flew above 10 metres - to be deemed as operating in non-private air space - and couldn’t film into private residences.

He said investigations were largely prompted by complaints from within farming communities and farmers themselves who made reports via a dedicated 1800 number, to provide information anonymously.

Farmers have complained about animal mistreatment in feedlots and other intensive farming methods, he said, and also about untreated fly-strike, or animals left unsheltered in stressful situations, like exposure to extreme heat and cold, which the drone would now target.

Mr Pearson said facilities would also be targeted in WA and NT where animals were kept prior to loading onto boats for transport to live export markets.

He said Animal Liberation had offices and members throughout the nation that would be trained to use the drone to monitor animal welfare complaints.

Mr Pearson acknowledged most farmers were doing the right thing on-farm but the alleged mistreatment could often involve hundreds, if not thousands of animals that his group was seeking to protect by using the drone.

He said it was difficult to gather evidence without committing trespass which made it inadmissible in court.

Mr Pearson said the drone could fly 2km from the remote operating source and was programmed to return to its landing pad automatically, once the 45 minute power source was identified as running out.

He said any evidence or information relating to animal cruelty, like heat stress, was of public interest and likely to be published in the media.

It will be handed over to the NSW rural crime investigation unit or equivalent authorities around Australia, he said.

If his group is dissatisfied with the investigation’s progress they would contact television producers and individual journalists that had previously expressed interest in animal welfare stories and offer the story and evidence to them, such as ABC’s Four Corners and Lateline and Channel 9’s 60 Minutes.

Mr Pearson said before handing evidence over to police or the media, experts and trained veterinarians would be used to determine the true extent of actual animal cruelty.

“We have to be careful that we don’t make uniformed statements,” he said.

“Most of the intelligence we receive comes from within actual rural communities like people who drive past farms or facilities.

“They call us out of frustration, when they see things going wrong with animal welfare that need fixing and often say, ‘I never thought I’d call you bastards to make a complaint’.”

Mr Laurie said he was worried the drone could gather isolated evidence of animal cruelty that could be portrayed as the “norm” in mainstream media.

“We’re offended by being judged on individual incidents that ignore the vast majority of good practices and the vast improvements in animal welfare made by the industry over a long period of time,” he said.

Mr Laurie said he was concerned animal rights groups would run the evidence past alleged “experts” for their opinions but it would not be sighted by industry members who dealt with animal welfare “day in and day out”.

He said the industry was already subject to a high degree of internal policing and peer pressure around animal welfare, with farmers willing to make complaints about other farmers who do the wrong thing and leave industry exposed.

Mr Laurie said that peer pressure helped create higher animal welfare standards and forced those producers, who were not willing to adhere to accepted practices, out of the industry because they don’t feel comfortable.

Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


3/04/2013 5:03:49 AM

11m above anyones property is the owners airspace. A property owner owns the airspace above their property that they can reasonably use. Flight by aircraft in the airspace above the land of another is a trespass, if entry interferes substantially with the owner’s actual use and enjoyment of his land. It could easily be argued that a helicopter flying at 11m would cause stress and worry to the landowner and stock and would infringe on their use of the land. More than 150m above the ground would be a different matter but 11m is a blatant trespass. Try flying a drone at an ALF match at 11m.
3/04/2013 5:40:08 AM

ethics from animals aus??? in what universe would anyone expect that ??
3/04/2013 7:21:47 AM

11 metres is within shot gun range!
Dirty Redneck
3/04/2013 10:27:30 AM

And when one of these drones causes a crash ( and the pilot is killed ) of a helecopter or plane that is being used for farming purposes like mustering or spraying then the likes of Mark Pearson should be up on man-slaughter charges.
3/04/2013 11:22:55 AM

So I can fly drones over the homes of Animal Liberation members to ensure that they are not mistreating their children or husband/wife? My property is also my home and I believe as such I am entitled to privacy. Good luck to them sending drones over properties the size of some of the stations in Australia. Would not that $14,000 be better spent helping buy feed for drought stricken animals or animals whose feed has been burnt out?
Rob Roy
3/04/2013 12:21:01 PM

I seem to remember that Alan Bond's blimp used to cruise over Sydney suburbs at only a few hundred metres & often came home with bullet holes in it. It caused a lot of angst.
3/04/2013 12:32:19 PM

These Animal Liberation people are total freaks $14,000 would never cover the cost of a drone, where are they getting the money from. Anyway, "For each and every action", these people are pushing farmers beyond the point of toleration.
3/04/2013 4:29:39 PM

what is the woruld coming to
Love the country
3/04/2013 5:53:48 PM

Pretty good at clay pidgon....he,he.he......
Harry the hornet
3/04/2013 9:46:20 PM

Always 'isolated' isnt NFF? What crap, and you know it. Animal abuse is rife..and that is why you are all so worried.
1 | 2  |  next >


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who