MG listing worth the journey

14 Jul, 2015 02:00 AM
Comments
5
 
Farmers understood the co-operative's strategy, but they did not blindly support the float

Inside the Murray Goulburn float deal:

IT WAS shaping as the winter of Murray Goulburn's discontent when it started a book-build for its $500 million partial float.

On the second-last day of June, the dairy co-operative's managing director, Gary Helou, and chief financial officer, Brad Hingle, bunkered down in the offices of their capital markets investment bank, Macquarie Group.

Despite Helou's public assurances the float would succeed, market forces threatened otherwise. The ASX was down 2.2 per cent that afternoon, extending its losses to 9.4 per cent since the end of April.

Several institutional investors, which had committed to Murray Goulburn's initial public offering, had withdrawn their support, citing the volatility. And earlier in the month, insurance reseller Greenstone, and printer and marketing company IVE Group, abandoned their respective $900 million and $100 million initial public offerings.

The situation was tense for all involved.

But by the end of the week, after tens of hours of phone calls, Murray Goulburn listed on the ASX. It secured $437.7 million from non-farmer investors, and another $62.3 million from two supplier share offers, meeting its $500 million target.

The final unit price, $2.10, was at the bottom of the range, but as Murray Goulburn shareholder and supplier Craig Dettling said: "That makes bugger all difference. At least they got the money."

So how did the partial listing of Australia's biggest milk processor succeed?

Even when the market was shaky, Murray Goulburn's board remained confident the capital raising to fund sweeping upgrades across the co-operative factories, to focus more on high-value dairy goods - such as infant formula and consumer beverages and cheeses - would succeed.

It took hope from Macquarie's team, led by bankers David Mustow and Hugh Falcon. They helped to identify two cornerstone investors, while the co-operative found another two. On the retail broking side, Evans and Partners, Morgans Financial, PAC Partners, Macquarie and Bell Potter were called on.

Helou had maintained Murray Goulburn would get support from international investors, particularly in Asia, saying there was "pent-up demand" for agriculture stocks. In the Murray Goulburn camp, company secretary and general counsel Fiona Smith was the project leader.

The transaction was dubbed Project Two Rivers, drawing on the company's name and the Murray and Goulburn rivers.

Two weeks before the book-build, Helou flew to Hong Kong, then to Europe and New Zealand to sell the float. The pitch was simple. Helou and Hingle took their trusty sachets of milk powder and some of their UHT milk as a great example of the strategy.

One investor who was impressed was Chinese billionaire Richard Liu, who is the chief executive of internet retailing giant JD.com.

JD, which sells Murray Goulburn's Devondale-branded products for more than double the price to China's wealthy middle class, spent $20 million on a 4.6 per cent stake in the trust, becoming its sixth-biggest unit holder.

Anchorage Capital is another big shareholder.

The path to listing began at the co-operative's 2013 annual general meeting, but it wasn't the main agenda item. Lazard, which had conducted an earlier scoping study, was announced as a joint adviser alongside Macquarie, and Herbert Smith Freehills was the law firm appointed. Lazard's Charles Whiting was the advisory firm's point person.

Farmers understood the co-operative's strategy, particularly how focusing more on value-add products and less on bulk dairy goods would insulate them against volatility on commodity markets and deliver a more stable farm gate milk price.

But they did not blindly support the float. After 16 workshops, Murray Goulburn's suppliers rubbished the co-operative's plan for farmers to have a minimum shareholding.

Instead of farmers buying 500 shares at $1 each, it was proposed that a new farmer must hold one share for every kilogram of milk solids it supplied to Murray Goulburn, potentially saddling young farmers with more debt.

After more farmer workshops, Murray Goulburn's management agreed to keep the 500 share buy-in, except they would be valued at the market price instead of the static $1.

It also won over farmers with tying the dividend yield to the milk price. If the milk price is high, so is the dividend. Under the Fonterra model, it's the opposite, with expectations from farmers and investors at times colliding.

Murray Goulburn's legal advisers, Tim McEwen and James Crowe of Freehills, said its plan to flip the New Zealand structure ensures the interests of both unitholders and farmer shareholders were aligned, with each benefiting from milk price rises.

Murray Goulburn appears to have got it right. Since the IPO, its units have gained 13.8 per cent to $2.39, compared with the broader market sagging 1.6 per cent.

Page:
1
AFR
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Jock Munro
14/07/2015 5:45:48 AM

All of the back slapping and hype will not disguise the fact that the MG farmer suppliers are selling off their co op and their financial interests will now become secondary to those of shareholders.
Cocky
14/07/2015 7:48:25 AM

Can anyone else smell a foreign take over brewing?
hayseed
14/07/2015 12:37:24 PM

How long before Saputo appear on the Share register??
Jock Munro
14/07/2015 6:18:18 PM

The Chinese communist government are already on the registry.
John Hine
16/07/2015 5:09:15 AM

Two key questions: * why did so few farmers buy shares in 'their' coop * why did MG have to go off-shore to seek investors? Why dont our super funds look at such investment?

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who