US and China agree to carbon caps

13 Nov, 2014 06:49 AM
Comments
123
 
The new power generation: US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the end of their news conference in Beijing. Photo: Reuters
We hope to encourage all major economies to be ambitious
The new power generation: US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping at the end of their news conference in Beijing. Photo: Reuters

CHINA and the US have struck a landmark climate change deal setting ambitious new targets to cut pollution, including an unprecedented commitment by Beijing to cap its carbon emissions.

With an eye on pushing through a global climate agreement in Paris next year, the surprise deal – negotiated in secret over the past nine months – was jointly announced in Beijing yesterday.

US President Barack Obama announced a target to cut US emissions by 26 to 28 per cent below 2005 levels by 2025, doubling the pace of reduction it had previously targeted for the period from 2005 to 2020.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping pledged to cap its growing carbon emissions by 2030, or earlier if possible, while setting the challenging goal of increasing the share of zero-emission non-fossil fuel to 20pc of the country's energy mix by the same year.

"As the world's two largest economies, energy consumers and emitters of greenhouse gases, we have a special responsibility to lead the global effort against climate change," Mr Obama said.

Describing the agreement as "historic", Mr Obama invoked a famous phrase from former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping.

"We must seek truth from facts," he said, "and the truth is we have made important progress today for the benefit of both our nations and the benefit of the world."

In what might be interpreted as a veiled reference to Australia, Mr Obama said: "We hope to encourage all major economies to be ambitious - all countries, developing and developed - to work across some of the old divides, so we can conclude a strong global climate agreement next year."

The Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, welcomed the deal. "We have always said that we will consider Australia's post-2020 emissions reduction targets in the lead-up to next year's Paris conference. This will take into account action taken by our major trading partners," he said.

But Labor and the Greens seized on the historic deal to launch a blistering attack on the Abbott government's climate policy, arguing Australia is going backwards in tackling climate change, accusing Prime Minister Tony Abbott of holding "flat earth views" and urging greater emissions reductions.

The deal comes on the eve of the G20 summit in Brisbane, which both the US and Chinese presidents will attend, and significantly ratchets up pressure on Mr Abbott, who has been reluctant to even discuss climate change at the economic summit. Climate change is conspicuously absent from major items on the agenda at the summit.

China's move to cap its emissions growth by 2030, or sooner if possible, has potentially significant implications for Australian exports of coal to China.

It also set an ambitious goal of increasing the share of non-fossil fuels to 20pc of the country's energy mix by 2030. An equivalent target for Australia to the US pledge would be a 30pc reduction in emissions against 2000 levels by 2025.

Earlier this year, Australia scrapped its carbon tax and environmental groups now question whether the Coalition's replacement Direct Action policy can reach the stated target of a five per cent reduction by 2020.

Australia 'going backwards': Shorten

Labor leader Bill Shorten says Australia is going backwards in tackling climate change in the wake of the historic US-China deal.

Mr Shorten said on Wednesday the "historic and ambitious" agreement showed global leadership from the US and China.

"At the G20 this week, Australia will hold the embarrassing title of being the only nation going backwards on climate change. With China and the United States representing around one-third of the global economy and over 40 per cent of global emissions, there will be significant momentum to deal with climate change in Brisbane," he said.

"Tony Abbott fought and fought to stop climate change being discussed at this weekend's G20. If Tony Abbott still refuses to discuss the need to take action on climate change at the G20, he will embarrass Australia in front of the rest of the world.

"Tony Abbott's flat-earth views are out of touch with Australians and out of touch with world leaders. Climate change is not just an environmental issue. It is a security issue and it is absolutely an economic issue. Tony Abbott's failure to recognise this represents a failure of leadership."

Greens leader Christine Milne said the deal should be a "massive wake-up call to Tony Abbott. His continued climate denial and his destruction of the environment is reckless."

Senator Milne lashed Mr Abbott for unwinding climate policies such as the carbon tax and "failing to notice the global economy is changing around him".

Observers said the deal lacked genuine ambition and fell short of what was needed to reverse the course of climate change.

"The two biggest emitters have come to the realisation that they are bound together and have to take actions together," said Li Shuo, senior climate and energy campaigner for Greenpeace East Asia. "However, both sides have yet to reach the goal of a truly game-changing climate relationship."

How the deal happened

Mr Obama was in Beijing to attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation summit, and stayed to pay a state visit to China at Mr Xi's invitation.

The pair spoke for five hours over a private dinner at the Chinese president's walled compound in central Beijing on Tuesday, where Mr Xi told his guest he hoped they had laid the foundation for a co-operative relationship, or as he put it, "A pool begins with many drops of water".

The pair met again on Wednesday morning before fronting their joint press conference, where Mr Xi made a rare concession by accepting questions from an American journalist.

In his response, Mr Xi defended China's human rights record while acknowledging "it was always a work in progress", denounced Hong Kong's pro-democracy protests as illegal, while brushing off concerns of treatment of foreign journalists working in China – with Bloomberg and New York Times having trouble renewing visas for their correspondents after writing a series of investigative reports on the private wealth of China's elite leaders.

"The party which has created problems should be the one who resolves them," he said.

In Australia, Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis director Tim Buckley said the pact was "deliberately timed to put (climate change) on the agenda for the G20".

"It's not going to be good news for Australia," Mr Buckley said, adding that the country was already being seen "as a bit of a pariah" on climate policy.

Erwin Jackson, deputy chief executive of the Climate Institute, said the deal "makes us like a bit like a roo in a spotlight".

"We've had an obsession with 2020 targets for renewable energy and emissions," he said.

"The world is increasingly focused on post-2020 actions and Australia doesn't currently have any domestic policy that would reduce emissions on the scale being put forward by the US and other major emitters."

Impact on coal industry

Signs that China will curb coal demand won't help Australia's coal exporters, already struggling with a price that has halved in recent years and sunk to $US61.70 a ton this week.

But in the wake of the announcement, Minerals Council chief executive Brendan Pearson predicted China would target its efforts to reducing the use of low quality coal in boilers in buildings and small manufacturing and shift the emphasis to modern, highly efficient centralised supercritical coal-fired power generation.

"This will require high quality coal which Australia is well-placed to supply. In fact, estimates suggest that China's coal fleet will expand by 400 GW by 2040; that's more than the USA's entire coal sector (300 GW)."

The Minerals Council also stressed the prominent role technology would play, under the agreement, in reducing emissions.

Coal is Australia's second largest export to China after iron ore, with sales of just over $9 billion in 2013 according to Department of Foreign Affairs statistics.

Mr Abbott said recently that coal was "good for humanity" and said it had a "big future, as well as a big past".

Green groups have been pressuring the government to announce targets for the post-2020 period after it failed to take deeper cuts to emissions to a special climate summit in New York earlier this year.

The government has committed to reviewing Australia's targets in the new year, but environmental groups warn it is running out of time.

The deal also comes as the government has set out to scale back Australia's renewable energy target. On Tuesday, Labor walked away from negotiations over the RET as neither major party could agree on what Australia's renewable policy should be.

SMH
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Sod Buster
13/11/2014 7:33:58 AM

Why did the Country Life leave out this pertinent inforemation ?... "U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) slammed the climate deal announced early Wednesday morning by President Barack Obama, contending it would hurt the American economy… “This unrealistic plan…would ensure higher utility rates and far fewer jobs...,” the senator, who is expected to be the next majority leader, concluded. “Easing the burden already created by EPA regulations will continue to be a priority for me in the new Congress.”..." (Note - Google an extract of the quotes to get several links)
Sod Buster
13/11/2014 7:43:20 AM

'We must seek truth from facts' Further pertinent info..... "...“China builds a coal-fired power plant every 10 days, is the largest importer of coal in the world, and has no known reserves of natural gas.”.. “The American people spoke against the President’s climate policies in this last election,” Inhofe said. “As we enter a new Congress, I will do everything in my power to reign in and shed light on the EPA’s unchecked regulations.”..." (Note - Google an extract of the quotes to get several links)
Frank Blunt
13/11/2014 8:36:44 AM

Is this the same pollutant that another article in this paper states is a harmless and beneficial plant nutrient ? Which one is it ? Can't be both again can it ?
Itz Me
13/11/2014 9:10:23 AM

And the reality is that It is Bill Shorten and Christine Milne who have the flat earth views and either or both would send us back to the 1800s and broke if they were still in power. We just had an election and the people of Australia clearly rejected the climate alarmist flat earth views of the past ALP/Greens coalition who are under some wild delusion we are in a climate emergency and we installed a much more sensible person called Tony who has at least some idea that the only climate emergency we were in was the one going on in Gillards/Rudds/Shortens and Milnes misguided imagination.
Batman
13/11/2014 9:20:50 AM

O'buma must be smoking something , they just had midterm elections last week and the people of the USA clearly rejected him and his flat earth climate policy.
seethelight
13/11/2014 11:12:27 AM

Sod Buster should get into the journalism game.In a few words he has covered the story that the professionals seem to have a missed.China's going to cap emissions, but not until 2030, perhaps.Its a meaningless agreement designed to deceive the wilfully blind.The one emission that China will not try to limit is co2. Its plant food. Free fertiliser for crops. Asian countries are already well advanced in developing crop varieties that will thrive on more co2 in the air. . They're going to have to help themselves. The ruling elite here want to banish co2 from the atmosphere.It causes bad weather
Holy Moly
13/11/2014 11:43:33 AM

itz Me,I dont know if you noticed that your wise mate Tony is blowing billions of tax money on Direct Action.may be you could try keeping up with curent affairs.
Qlander
13/11/2014 12:34:25 PM

A couple of politicians have made vague promises, about something that might happen long after they've retired.
Bushie Bill
13/11/2014 12:34:53 PM

I thought we had already sorted you out, Frankie Boy. The answer is: of course it can, as would be evident to anyone who gave it a nanosecond of thought.
Itz Me
13/11/2014 12:41:49 PM

Holy Moly yes we all need to seethelight and you may be correct about the billions so I have a lot more work to do yet in educating the dumbed down sheeple about the world of make believe they live in.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who