Water fight on land

25 Jun, 2008 11:15 AM
Shadow agricultural minister Gary Snook believes property rights could be eroded under the Water Resource Protection Plan
Shadow agricultural minister Gary Snook believes property rights could be eroded under the Water Resource Protection Plan

FARMER property rights are being questioned after a Government move to introduce zoning restrictions over agricultural land under the Water Resource Protection policy.

Six farmers with more than 10,000ha in the Jurien region will be affected if a priority one zoning restriction is put in place under the policy.

A zoning restricts the practice of various land uses that are viewed as a threat to the quality of drinking water.

Shadow agriculture spokesman and Moore MLA Gary Snook said decent hard working farmers and their families would be sent to the financial and human scrap heaps if plans to introduce a zoning restriction went ahead.

"The Department of Water is proposing to place a Priority One Zoning Restriction over 10,000ha of land north-east of Jurien Bay which will effectively put six farmers out of business," Mr Snook said.

He said under the restrictions of the department's protection notice, farmers could no longer crop their land, have stockyards, store fuel or chemicals, have kennels for their dogs, or run their business from their home.

Mr Snook said all of these uses and dozens more were not permitted under the proposal P1 Zoning which, if gazetted, would put farmers out of business.

"Apart from being an outrageous attack on farmer's rights to farm their land and feed their families, it will permanently devalue their land," Mr Snook said.

"It is totally immoral for any government to take away a farmer's right to use and enjoy the capital value of their farm and is a clear case of eroding a farmer's property rights.

"His life savings and superannuation are tied to these rights.

"This zoning restriction will transfer a landowner's private equity into the public or corporate sector, further impacting the farmer because he would not only lose income from being restricted on what he could produce but would lose value on his land.

"The Government can earn income through the sale of water by the Water Corporation and the corporate sector benefits from development property sales.

"This proposal does not account for good strategic planning which should be done as a whole of government approach, recognising the need for special residential and special rural buffering urban zones from broadacre farms.

"There are massive amounts of better quality water sources a few kilometres further east which lie under huge Crown reserves and this is where the long term future supply for an anticipated Jurien population of 20-30,000 people should come from.

"In the short term, a lesser priority zoning will adequately protect the water source and farmers and landowners can get on with their lives and try to stay in business."

Mr Snook said affected landholders had no avenue of appeal if they oppose the selected proposal.

Department water resource management director John Ruprecht said whatever the decision was arrived at in terms of zoning restrictions, farmers could still continue to carry out existing land uses.

"We haven't done a detailed survey of existing land use at this point in time, existing land use can continue," Mr Ruprecht said.

"We will be encouraging best practice with practices such as cropping to minimise any impact on water quality.

"If at some point in time those land uses changed we would need to approve that change."



Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who