Wilmar worries galvanise growers

22 May, 2014 07:15 AM
Wilmar's proposal sent chills up the spine of growers right across Queensland

UNHAPPY cane growers have turned up in big numbers to a series of regional meetings in Queensland following Wilmar International's move to bypass the national sugar marketing company and set up its own trading business.

Last month Wilmar announced it would exit the current industry-owned Queensland Sugar Limited (QSL) export marketing arrangements and set up its own commercial model tied to its global trading operation, one of the world's biggest sugar businesses.

Wilmar has capacity to crush about 50 per cent of Australia's sugar cane destined for export thanks to its 2010 takeover of Sucrogen's seven (formerly CSR) mills, plus acquisition of the Proserpine mill in 2011.

The Singaporean-based business is part owned by US farm commodity giant Archer Daniels Midland, with which it has many processing relationships.

Chief executive officer of farmer organisation Canegrowers Brendan Stewart, said Wilmar's proposal "sent chills up the spine of growers right across Queensland - not just those in Wilmar areas".

Producers were worried about what the decision would mean for the future of family cane farms in Australia.

"We are talking about a move by an enormous corporate entity, wanting to make a decision which would change the landscape of marketing dramatically, immediately and forever," he said.

QSL's national export operation is jointly owned by farmers and cane processors, providing what farmers believe is the most transparent means of marketing their sugar crop via an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission-approved export desk.

Sugar produced by the NSW Sugar Milling Co-operative is generally not sold for export and represents less than 10 per cent of national production.

Mr Stewart said while a lot of information had been published since the announcement, some of the messages and claims were not as clear as they appeared to be on the surface.

"Growers are worried the proposed action would take away growers choice to market through their industry-owned marketer, QSL, through which they get unrivalled transparency," he said

"On evidence to date, it is of the strong view that Wilmar's proposal is not in the long term best interests of the Australian sugar industry and particularly not for the growers on which it relies."

Meetings at held at Herbert, Proserpine and Plane Creek, and in the Burdekin Valley were organised by Canegrowers to break down Wilmar's claims, evaluate the real cost and develop an industry response.

Andrew Marshall

Andrew Marshall

is the national agribusiness writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


John Hine
23/05/2014 12:07:47 PM

Surely, once any corporate entity bought Sucrogen, QSLs future was in doubt? The failure of Qld growers to buy Sucrogen while it was on the market for ages was a major strategic error. Not sure what can be done now, other than to start their own mills, which would be really expensive.
24/05/2014 8:56:32 AM

Canegrowers have had ample time (and ample taxpayers' money) to either diversify away from cane or focus on reducing costs by, for example, aggregating properties. Your decades of constant whinging and calls for assistance are now falling on unsympathetic ears, fellas. Cut costs or cut and run. It's about time you let some real farmers manage your land.
Real Farmer
25/05/2014 1:34:42 PM

"Unhappy cane growers...." is there any other type?
Ted from Tully
25/05/2014 1:38:38 PM

What's the difference between a Qld cane farmer and a loose V-belt? The latter only makes a whining noise some of the time.


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who