Howes has a point: Fitzgibbon

06 Dec, 2013 01:00 AM
Comments
36
 
Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon says Australian agriculture is
We will need the assistance of big investment to lift that productivity
Shadow Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon says Australian agriculture is "facing a very different world".

SHADOW Agriculture Minister Joel Fitzgibbon has weighed into the controversy caused by Australian Workers' Union leader Paul Howes on Sunday after he referred to the demise of "ma and pa farms" in Australian agriculture.

“They are not words that I would have used, because I know some took offence to that,” Mr Fitzgibbon said during a speech in the House of Representatives.

“But I will say this for the comments by Paul Howes: to the extent that he was talking about the need to remodel agriculture in Australia, he was very close to the mark.

“We are facing a very different world.

“Family farms, particularly those small innovative farms that are now working to very much a 21st century model, will remain a very important part of our farming equation.

“But so too will big corporations.”

Mr Fitzgibbon was agriculture minister leading up to the September election following a cabinet reshuffle when Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister again in late June.

The Hunter MP expressed empathy towards Mr Howe’s comments, saying there would be more consolidation in the farming sector in future involving more corporatisation.

“We will address the big concern out there about where the next generation of farmers will come from by offering more graduate opportunities with big agricultural companies, equivalent to those companies that we see now mining the nation's oil, gas and coal,” he said.

“In my electorate of Hunter, where we have a good mix of agriculture, viticulture, horticulture, thoroughbred breeding and mining, we see on a regular basis young people roaming around in high visibility uniforms enjoying high wages, good job security, very good superannuation et cetera.

“These are the things that attract young people to certain careers.

“I believe that in the future these will be the same things that will attract young people to agriculture.”

Mr Fitzgibbon said regular concerns about drought, how tough banks can be and “how government has got policy wrong again” would be replaced by “real opportunities in agriculture”.

“Those opportunities will be present in the family farm model but will be more present, in my view, within big corporations seeking to exploit this wonderful opportunity presented by the dining boom,” he said.

“Let us not close our minds to these matters.

“Mr Howes may have, in my view, chosen his words better.

“But he does make a very sold point; that point being that in the 21st century we cannot just stick with the old models of the past if we want to fully capitalise on the dining boom.

“We will need the assistance of big investment to lift that productivity and that output to the extent necessary.

“It is very clear to me and to most thinking people that very large investment - investment to lift our output by up to three times - can only come from big corporations.

“Given our population and our limited capital in this country, it will largely come from multinational corporations that will more often than not be based offshore.

“We should not fear that. We should be encouraging it.”

Mr Howe’s comments about ma and pa farming came on the back of another significant controversy arising from Federal Treasurer Joe Jockey’s decision last Friday to block the $3.4 billion foreign takeover of Australia’s largest publicly listed agribusiness GrainCorp.

Mr Fitzgibbon said: “Nothing in the Treasurer's announcement last week served the purpose of encouraging foreign investment in agriculture in this country”.

“It has not come up until now because the demand was not there,” he said.

“It now is. Nor has the return been there.

“But, as demand continues to outstrip global supply, food prices in Asia and in other places will continue to rise and therefore the profitability of the investments by these big corporations will become more attractive and continue to rise.

“But more will obviously need to be done.”

Mr Fitzgibbon also laid down a challenge for his counterpart Barnaby Joyce to explain how the Coalition would deliver on its election commitment to inject an additional $100 million into Research and Development Corporations.

“One hundred million dollars is a lot of money, in proportional terms,” he said.

“In fact, it would be around 40 per cent of the current government's spend on RDCs. That is a big lift in investment in anybody's language.

“Of course that lift is something the opposition would welcome, but it would be more welcome if we saw some clear indication of how that $100 million will be spent or indeed how that $100 million figure was arrived at.

“How will the money be spent?

“Will the money indeed be forthcoming?

“I invite the minister to, sometime in the near future, reaffirm the now government's commitment to that $100 million promise.”

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

John Newton
6/12/2013 5:28:36 AM

What howes and Fitzgibbon are talking about are ginat monoculture farms. And when it comes to a showdown between monoculture and nature, there's only one winner.
Jock Munro
6/12/2013 5:28:38 AM

Joel Fitzgibbon's comments clearly reflect he and his colleagues contempt for individual ownership of assets whether it be farmers or small business. He has become smitten with the big end of town probably because it suits his distain for the individual. I am certain that Fitzgibbob's also reflects a jealosy of the independance of the private individual businessman. I think that some sections of the Liberal party are guilty of this as well as those in the corporate sector.
Denis
6/12/2013 6:01:29 AM

So the architect does not like what he has created!
Pete Mailler
6/12/2013 6:12:07 AM

Lotus eating unions demand ever increasing regulated minimum wages without a care for productivity. Agriculture underpins rural and regional economies and is the true life blood of the bush. Simply big business revenues do not stay in the bush. Time for our federal politicians to grow up. Australian farmers are forced to pay first world cost structures and then receive third world prices for our product. Unsustainable for our farmers and ultimately for anyone who draws a living, directly or indirectly, from the sector, big or small.
piece maker
6/12/2013 7:30:38 AM

A good starting point would be replacing the likes of Howes and Fitzgibbon rather than selling off Ma and Pa farms to foreigners that exploit Australian company and tax laws. At least Ma and Pa contribute to their Australian communities rather than flying in and out.
THE FARMER
6/12/2013 8:10:59 AM

The Dining boom only exists in the world of the tv chef .Down -down prices don't lead to increased returns for growers.
X AG Socialist
6/12/2013 8:18:48 AM

OK Joel . My farm has a PTY/LTD .check I wear a high vis vest ( or CBH wont sample my truck . check Am I young and well payed . nope
The Serf
6/12/2013 9:20:47 AM

Poor old Joel has misinterpreted what he has viewed from the highway in the Hunter; the high visibility uniforms he saw were actually mining industry employees!!! If corporate ownership is the way to go how come PrimeAg failed, RM Williams Pastoral failed? The Asian Food Idea will never eventuate for Australian farmers; food will be produced here for Asia but on their terms exactly like the Chinese Gov. Kununurra development; where the irrigation area is just another little piece of China.
against state owned fi
6/12/2013 9:54:15 AM

Get back to subsidising your inefficient car industry labor and stay away from agriculture. Why would big business touch ag? A study of abares figures shows most farms are going backwards. Family farms are much more driven and efficiency minded than corporate farms and how do shareholders view 5 years of drought and no profit, not well if they are accountable. Let economics sort themselves out and stop intereferring. If you want to invest in ag remove native veg limitations and let us get on with our job.
ladyfarmer
6/12/2013 9:57:07 AM

again, a past-it politician who did agriculture no favours in his time as minister spouting off. Agriculture is evolving - I guess then this "Ma" shouldn't be increasing and improving what we do every year on the farm- because we arent capable! as for a mining boom- when, where? havent seen anything tangible. oh & yes our employees wear hi-viz and are well paid....
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who