Meeting discusses grain prices

28 Feb, 2014 01:00 AM
Comments
6
 
According to Newdegate farmer Bob Iffla, bottlenecks at Albany Port are to blame for lower grain prices in that zone.
CBH needs to work more on our own facilities and marketing options ...
According to Newdegate farmer Bob Iffla, bottlenecks at Albany Port are to blame for lower grain prices in that zone.

ABOUT 50 people attended a public meeting in Lake Grace last Thursday to discuss the difference in handling costs between the Albany and Esperance Port Zones and future of Tier 3.

Prompted by speculation CBH is about to make a wide-scale investment on the east coast and the possibility Tier 3 will become unusable, the meeting was geared towards getting answers and developing a way forward.

Long-serving WAFarmers member Bob Iffla said the meeting – held by the WAFarmers Corrigin-Lake Grace Zone – was a platform for growers to discuss their concerns with grain traders and determine the next step in their pursuit of fairness.

Mr Iffla wants Nationals deputy leader Mia Davies to take up the cause and push for some certainty in both cases.

"Grain traders, CBH, Brookfield and WAFarmers need to make a joint approach to the government through Mia Davies, to secure Royalties for Regions funding as well as trying to attract federal funds for carbon emissions reductions," he said.

"This approach must also have relevant access fee safeguards, track usage and maintenance provisions."

During the meeting, Wheatbelt Rail Retention Alliance (WRRA) president Bill Cowan demanded CBH invest in its WA operations before setting its sights elsewhere.

He asked for assurances from the CBH board of directors that they would urgently invest in infrastructure in WA to resolve the bottlenecks in grain flow to terminals, before they commit further to interstate or overseas investments.

According to Mr Iffla, it is these bottlenecks that are severely disadvantaging growers in the Esperance and Albany zones.

"CBH is looking at spending our hard-earned money giving the Eastern States grain growers' better facilities and marketing options," he said.

"CBH needs to work more on our own facilities and marketing options within our State before our competitors.

"Both government and CBH directors need to have a good look at what is going on within port zones and fix the problem as we will not stand by and be discriminated against."

He said it boiled down to relevant access fee safeguards and track usage provisions.

"The problem at the Albany port is definitely the lack of ability to get grain onto the elevator," Mr Iffla said.

"Money needs to be put towards getting more trains into that port, they also need to get some bypass lanes put in so the train that's coming back can get off the rail on a little side track, and the others can go straight through, so we can get more train movement through and more rolling stock.

"Although the ports can handle two to three times the amount of grain we're producing, the infrastructure at the ports and around the ports – trains and rolling stock; holds up deliveries.

"Once the deliveries actually arrive to port however it's fine.

"We just can't believe CBH would even consider investing over east instead of maximising the returns to growers in a port that's the fastest growing production port in Australia."

Mr Iffla said the difference in grain prices between the three port zones was a real sore point.

"At the moment the difference between Geraldton and Albany is $39 per tonne, but it's been up over $50," he said.

"The average grower is producing about 2500-3000 tonnes of grain.

"You multiply that out by, let's say $30 per tonne that we're losing, and you can see why growers want to maximise their returns."

Mr Iffla said the solution was simple – CBH needed to invest more money in the affected zones.

"Not only at the ports but also the upkeep of some of these bins," he said.

"CBH did a marvellous job of taking the grain in this season, but it's the next stage that's the real problem.

"We've been the milking cow and now we want the money spent where it needs to be spent."

Page:
1
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Geraldton Producer
28/02/2014 6:11:21 AM, on Farm Weekly

Iffla wasn't whinging all those years the poor old Geraldton zone was cross subsidizing his returns down south in the sheep country. It just goes to show that when the free market goes against these guys they expect others to kick in and subsidize their existance. Pucker up, it is more expensive to get grain out of the Albany zone so the costs should lie with those producers. Your land is cheaper so you don't need to make as much.
Angry CBH Shareholder
28/02/2014 6:29:05 AM, on Farm Weekly

What the hell are these CBH directors on? This is madness spending hundred of millions of dollars on improving the returns of our competition, the East Coast farmer!!! I am furious and so are the rest of the shareholders I talk to. The board needs to come out and publicly rule this move OUT.
Puzzled
28/02/2014 6:46:12 AM, on Farm Weekly

"CBH needed to invest more money in the affected zones" I'm sorry but this type of comment shows how far some people are from reality and simply have no understanding of basic supply and demand and reasons for the differences. I suggest you go and learn some basics and then you may start to understand!!
drowning in debt
28/02/2014 6:48:26 AM, on Farm Weekly

maybe in all this madness of cbh misreading the wishes of its members we get a bunch of new directors who listen. this mob of hacks is running off on a tangent while the needs of members are being ignored. well ignore at your own peril. nsw is a dead dog flog. why invest in the competition?????
she told me to sell
28/02/2014 8:36:50 AM, on Farm Weekly

confucious say 'the competition is the competition'. why give the nsw farmers a hand up when the wa growers are heading for a handout? where is this company headed?
cmt
28/02/2014 10:37:17 AM, on Farm Weekly

By all means Bob Iffla, go for the upgrades by CBH that you need. However, getting what you want may not be achieved by holding CBH to ransom over their interstate projects. Consider the possibility that such projects may give CBH the chance to grow their business and capital base, to your benefit, by increasing overall revenue. Remember that with the current deregulated market, CBH has to contend with other business's entering their traditional territory. So it is only reasonable for CBH to have the same opportunity, is it not?

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who