Petition backs GM trials

21 Aug, 2013 02:00 AM
Comments
29
 

AUSTRALIAN plant scientists have joined their global colleagues, academics and other crop biotechnology supporters to condemn the recent destruction of scientific field trials of Golden Rice by activists in the Philippines.

Anti-biotechnology activists destroyed the genetically modified (GM) rice trials on August 8 to subvert months of government funded research work, while sabotaging further data collection.

Golden Rice contains a gene which helps to produce Vitamin A and is seen as a means of helping to alleviate malnutrition for millions of people in developing countries like the Philippines.

Lack of vitamin A has been attributed to diseases which cause up to two million deaths and 500,000 cases of irreversible blindness each year.

The activist attack has been challenged in an online petition initiated by United States-based geneticist Channapatna Prakash of Tuskegee University in Alabama.

Dr Channapatna is aiming to gather 5000 signatures to help show policy makers and politicians in the Philippines the importance of continuing on with the plant research.

The petition collected 1000 signatures in the first 24 hours and had almost 3000 by Sunday night.

In an open letter accompanying the petition, Dr Channapatna said GM crops are “a critical resource in accelerating increases in crop productivity in general and enhancing their nutritional value to treat malnutrition and nutrient deficiencies”.

“In that context, Golden Rice is a critical resource in fighting the devastating consequences of widespread vitamin A deficiency in developing nations,” he wrote.

“Research on Golden Rice at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) is part of their humanitarian work to reduce vitamin A deficiency, a serious condition of malnutrition mostly affecting women and children by causing sickness and leading, in many cases, to blindness and premature death of millions each year.

“Golden Rice, when it becomes freely available to farmers as planned, can substantially contribute to the alleviation of this important aspect of malnutrition.

“Not a single one of the many claims of negative health or environmental effects uniquely made against GM crops has withstood scientific scrutiny.

“It is an unconscionable criminal act to destroy a field trial conducted in accordance to international safety norms.”

The petition was signed by University of Canberra toxicology expert and former Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) risk assessment general manager Andrew Bartholomaeus.

In adding his signature to the list, Dr Bartholomaeus said, “I care about the health and prosperity of future generations”.

“As a toxicologist with 30 years of experience in food, cosmetics, pesticides and pharmaceuticals I know the claims about risks of GM food are disingenuous and reflect a political rather than moral position,” he said.

“The lives of millions are at risk from the mindless actions of ill informed anti-biotech activists.”

In signing the petition, Alex Taylor of Oxford in the UK said, “670,000 children under five will die this year because of Vitamin A deficiency, we can prevent that”.

Anastasia Bodnar of Rockville Maryland in the US said “Genetic engineering has the potential to do a lot of good in the world”.

“Increased nutrition, higher yields, reduced inputs - the only thing stopping us is activists who just refuse to consider the science.”

Former anti-GM activist and UK environmentalist Mark Lynas promoted the petition on his Twitter account, tweeting “Ignorance triumphs when good people say nothing”.

He also described comments by Greenpeace in a New Scientist article on the Golden Rice vandalism as “stupid”.

In outlining reasons for the activist attack in the article, Greenpeace’s Philippines based program manager Beau Baconguis said not enough safety testing was done on any GM crops.

She said the activists took matters into their own hands due to concerns about their crops being contaminated.

But experts from the IRRI dismissed any risks of contamination saying the confined field trials were fenced and covered and rice self-pollinated and was therefore unlikely to spread to other crops.

The petition was also backed by University of Georgia Crop Science Professor Wayne Parrott.

In an interview with Fairfax Agricultural Media in March, Professor Parrott said those who oppose crop-biotechnology based on anti-science views should spend a day living in impoverished countries and experience first-hand what impact their activism is having on lives.

He said most of his outreach work was conducted in Latin America, where food security needs are urgent.

He said anti-GM activists needed to live for one day as a Central American peasant to realise “just what it is they are denying the people who need the technology the most”.

“Food is an emotional issue,” he said.

“People are not always rational about their food.

“Therefore, the anti-GM lobby can yet kill the technology around the world.”

  • The petition is at http://www.change.org/petitions/global-scientific-community-condemns-the-recent-destruction-of-field-trials-of-golden-rice-in-the-philippines
  • Page:
    1
    FarmOnline
    Colin Bettles

    Colin Bettles

    is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
    Date: Newest first | Oldest first

    READER COMMENTS

    fairgro
    21/08/2013 5:31:59 AM

    Whoever said the lady who said 'let them eat cake!' was dead! This highlights the total lack of conscience, decency, reality or humanity of those whose mantra is blind hate of this powerful technology. If one of their affluent, spoiled children was at risk of blindness, I am sure their ridiculous attitude would change. Their arrogance is breathtaking, and their ignorance is debilitating.
    Anders
    21/08/2013 6:59:14 AM

    Your link to the petition does not work, try http://www.change.org/petitions/g lobal-scientific-community-condem ns-the-recent-destruction-of-fiel d-trials-of-golden-rice-in-the-ph ilippines
    John Newton
    21/08/2013 7:03:22 AM

    Extracting beta carotene from all the micronutrients in the foods that deliver it is bad reductive science. And moreover, with what has been shown so far, 300 grams of golden rice can only provide at most 20% of an adult’s daily vitamin A requirement (see graph). A child would have a lower requirement of 450 µg retinol as against 500-600 µg retinol for adults.12 But 300 g of rice a day is way too much for a child. In the Philippines, pre-school children consume less than 150 grams of rice a day Another dumb idea from the biotechs.
    Cassandra
    21/08/2013 7:03:29 AM

    If you look up GMOS on the internet you'll find far more dishonest critiques of genetic engineering than accurate articles. I finally realized why almost all my friends think genetic engineering is evil - they have been lied to for years, and the lies always include the names of a few real or fictitious scientists. I can't imagine how we can backtrack this, at this point. I'm sick over every aspect of this hysteria brought on by falsehoods.
    mug
    21/08/2013 8:24:22 AM

    Wake up to reality Cassandra! However what I notice with interest is that it is those who wish to put their snout in the trough who are the motivators. The growers don't seem to be asking for it . WHY ?
    Robert Wager
    21/08/2013 10:51:08 AM

    "growers don't seem to ask for it" Wow are you wrong. GM crops are the fastest ag technology adoption rate EVER. Over 17 million farmers grow them with an annual increase of >10%.
    cropdoc
    21/08/2013 11:48:42 AM

    GM technology may produce great crops and foods in the future, but it is a MAY. Ask any person with Auto-immune disease if having a rouge system in the body is good for health or pleasant, you would get a 100% NO. Yet the GM industry wants us to put a rouge gene sequence in our body with no long term health effects tested. The GM industry could convince most of the anti GM lobby by having independent multi- generational trials done that show its safe. Prove the 'science', show it has no long term negative health effects, I know vitamin A is essential but is golden rice a healthy delivery
    cv
    21/08/2013 11:56:51 AM

    by all means grow gm, just please give us labeling so we can choose to buy it or not. Cassandra, there is no obligation for the people who fund studies into gm to publish studies that don't back up their claim that its safe. you can have 99 studies against gm and 1 for it, they only publish that one study.
    Graingrower
    21/08/2013 2:18:36 PM

    The really big issue is who will control the food chain in the future. If you own a link you control the chain. Multinationals are positioning themselves to do this, what they need is a tool to allow this to happen. I don't know if Gm foods are unsafe or not, they should be independently tested though. There is a real benefit of GM in pre breading, it speeds up the process. Ask Canadian farmers about $30 kg for canola seed. Then tell Aussie farmers that don't worry you can always choose non GM. The multinationals just buy the smaller breeders and there goes the choice.
    jeffito
    21/08/2013 2:29:20 PM

    If cropdoc actually meant rogue and not "rouge" I wonder if CD could explain what a rogue gene actually is, tell us who has ever seen one in GM food and what is the connection to autoimmune disease? Is a rogue gene anything like a bunyip or perhaps a Nullabor Nymph?
    1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

    POST A COMMENT


    Screen name *
    Email address *
    Remember me?
    Comment *
     

    COMMENTS

    light grey arrow
    Reality of supply and demand. I remember many oat marketers including CBH saying while they were
    light grey arrow
    At a $114 per tonne i feel like we have been bent over & abused .They went out of their way to
    light grey arrow
    The author makes two great points: 1) Investment in people is a huge opportunity 2) Employees