Mixed report for GM crops

31 May, 2016 05:55 AM
Comments
2
 
A US report has found there are no safety concerns from eating food from genetically modified (GM) crops, but has also found there are growing problems with resistance to chemistry used in GM cropping systems.
A US report has found there are no safety concerns from eating food from genetically modified (GM) crops, but has also found there are growing problems with resistance to chemistry used in GM cropping systems.

A REPORT from the US-based National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine has found there is no substantiated evidence of risks to human health due to eating food from genetically modified (GM) crops.

However, while this has been seized upon by proponents of GM technology, the report is not all good news for the GM lobby.

It also found there were significant problems with resistance to the pesticides used in GM crop production systems.

The major two types of GM food crops currently produced are insect tolerant (IT) and herbicide tolerant (HT) but there are evolving resistance problems in terms of both insect resistance and weeds tolerant of the herbicides used in the cropping system.

The report authors examined almost 900 research and other publications on the development, use, and effects of genetically engineered characteristics in maize (corn), soybean, and cotton, which account for the vast majority of GM food crops.

In terms of food safety, the committee found that available epidemiological data do not show associations between any disease or chronic conditions and the consumption of GM foods.

Along with that, the report said there was some evidence that GM insect-resistant crops have had benefits to human health by reducing insecticide poisonings.

In terms of benefits to growers, the report found GM soybeans, cotton and maize have generally been good economically for farmers, but this depended on the individual circumstances.

It also found dangerous levels of insect resistance developing against the insect repellent traits where appropriate resistance management strategies were not used.

The report comes as parliamentary debate continues in Western Australia regarding repealing the GM moratorium bill.

WA growers are at present free to grow GM canola, but by repealing the moratorium act, the Government would create certainty regarding the state’s ongoing position.

Matthew Cossey, chief executive Australia’s plant science industry peak organisation CropLife Australia, said he hoped common sense would prevail over partisan politics.

“Putting narrow misguided party politics ahead of good policy is irresponsible when so many growers rely on the choice of making farming more profitable and more environmentally sustainable with GM crops,” he said.

Bob Phelps, of anti-GM group GeneEthics, said while the Australian plant sciences sector talked up GM canola technology, the actions of farmers showed it was not winning over the hearts and minds of growers like it was expected to.

“In Western Australia, 30 per cent of the canola crop is GM, but that drops to 11pc in Victoria and 13pc in NSW.”

FarmOnline
Gregor Heard

Gregor Heard

is the national grains writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

wtf
1/06/2016 6:04:17 AM

As normal this report has been produced by the usual conflict of interest crowd, so its legitimacy is ruled out. There has been no labelling of food so there can be no Hum epidemiological study with any significance. Reviews by Van Eenanaam and Snell have already been show to be an insult to scientific validity, so they should not even be included. Where was the Field Pea study and its significance? as usual no mention of it. Australia needs to walk away from the US science which has been corrupted, no more trade agreements, they do not facilitate trade, just subservience to corrupt groups
Bob Phelps
4/06/2016 12:43:47 PM

The WA government & pro-GM lobbyists imagine that: "by repealing the moratorium act (GM Crops Free Areas Act 2003), the Government would create certainty regarding the state’s ongoing position." But under the national uniform system of GM regulation, all state & territory governments signed an Intergovernment Agreement in 2001 that still applies. Under the deal, states & territories retain the right to create GM and GM-free Zones for marketing reasons. Even without the Act, future governments can still declare GM-free Zones. Gene Ethics is a GM-free advocacy network, not an "anti-GM group".

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who