Abbott slams wind farms

11 Jun, 2015 09:50 AM
Not only are they visually awful, they make a lot of noise

PRIME Minister Tony Abbott has described wind farms as "visually awful" and boasted slashing the Renewable Energy Target (RET) will restrict growth in the industry.

Mr Abbott also said the Howard government would never have introduced the clean energy policy if it had its time over again.

In a wide-ranging interview on Sydney radio station 2GB, Mr Abbott said he was prevented by the Senate in his desire to further cut the growth of new wind farms.

Mr Abbott made the remarks after the conservative broadcaster Alan Jones asked why the government had agreed to subsidise wind farms when residents living near them claim to suffer health problems.

"Prime Minister, these people are refugees in their own homes, you've done a deal on renewable energy which includes wind power when there's a Senate inquiry highlighting the deleterious effects these things are having on public health," Jones said.

"When will someone in government listen to these poor people and the problems they face?"

"I mean if it didn't affect health, put them on Parliament House, put them in Macquarie Street, put them on Parramatta Road."

Mr Abbott replied the location of wind farms was primarily a state government issue but said he agreed they could cause health problems.

"Well Alan look, I do take your point about the potential health impact of these things," Mr Abbott said.

"When I've been up close to these wind farms, there's no doubt, not only are they visually awful, they make a lot of noise.

"What we did recently in the Senate was reduce, Alan, reduce, capital R-E-D-U-C-E the number of these things that we are going to get in the future," he said.

"Now I would frankly have liked to have reduced the number a lot more."

"Good, well you're the boss!" Jones interrupted.

"But we got the best deal with could out of the Senate and if we hadn't had a deal Alan, we would have been stuck with even more of these things," Mr Abbott continued.

"This particular policy was a policy that was put in place in the late days of the Howard government, knowing what we know now, I don't think we would have gone down this path in this way.

"But at the time we though it was the right way forward. Sometimes you've got to deal with the situation that you've got rather than the ideal. What we've managed to do through this, admittedly imperfect ... is reduce the growth rate of this particular sector as much as the current Senate would allow us to do."

A study conducted by the government's own National Health and Medical Research Council recently found that there is no "consistent evidence" that wind farms damage human health but called for further research.

Jones observed that the government did not subsidise the "little businesses" of his listeners who he said were up at 5am "baking bread" for $900 per week.

Mr Abbott's description of wind turbines as "visually awful" echoes a similar attack launched by Treasurer Joe Hockey during an interview with Jones in 2014.

""Can I be a little indulgent? I drive to Canberra to go to Parliament ... and I must say I find those wind turbines around Lake George to be utterly offensive," Mr Hockey said at the time. "I think they're a blight on the landscape."

Labor and the Coalition agreed in May to reduce the amount of renewable energy required by law by 2020 to 33,000 gigawatt hours.

The government has been trying to slash the target after a review by climate change sceptic Dick Warburton recommended cutting the existing legislated goal of 41,000 gigawatt-hours of all power coming from renewables by 2020.

Andrew Bray, the Australian Wind Alliance national co-ordinator, said wind farms kept farm land viable in regional Australia.

"Wind farms present once in a lifetime economic opportunities for windy parts of regional Australia," he said.

"Continual government interference in renewable energy comes at a cost. It deprives regional communities of economic opportunities they should be enjoying now and holds Australia back from becoming the renewable energy powerhouse we should be."

Date: Newest first | Oldest first


11/06/2015 11:04:50 AM

If you have to put towers on your farm, your a failure as a farmer and have no regard for your community or the environment your destroying. One farmer gains an income while dozens nearby suffer and devalue their farms. Thank you Alan for your help. I have said it before, if they aren't a problem build them in every park in every suburb in every city. We would soon see the truth, when all the pro wind hypocrites start winging about the noise and sickness.
Rural Realist
11/06/2015 1:05:55 PM

I believe there is research continuing in Germany to determine if the 'wind turbine syndrome' is placebo or if certain people are more prone to subsonic noise effects than others. Nevertheless new turbines produce negligible noise anyway! Having lived near a wind farm for a year, they certainly didn't affect me, and Invey perhaps there are other factors why they aren't in cities, i.e. land, cabling, power station costs.
11/06/2015 1:30:24 PM

A group of distinguished scientists published a study in 2013, using key international research papers investigating the actual cost of coal-fired electricity generation. It makes interesting reading. See: How_coal_burns_Aust._-_True_cost_ of_burning_coal_04-13.pdf
Black Stump
11/06/2015 2:41:36 PM

Chinese tourists coming here would be laughing their heads off at these things. The western world has really lost its way. Did they ever really think these were the future of power generation ? No wonder we are going backwards. Now if it was 1915 I could maybe understand it , but in 2015 I can't .
11/06/2015 3:37:39 PM

This is an absolutely ridiculous argument. Until the results come out and show this is a health risk, using the excuse that they're not "visually appealing" is frankly distasteful and plain ridiculous.
11/06/2015 3:54:56 PM

I would rather a wind farm than a coal mine...
Tim Macknay
11/06/2015 4:05:38 PM

"Chinese tourists coming here would be laughing their heads off at these things." China has around fifty times as much wind power installed as Australia, and they're building over ten times as much as Australia's total installed capacity each year. They're also buying way less of our coal. They're preparing for the future, not burying their heads in the sand.
11/06/2015 7:20:43 PM

So a wind turbine is uglier than a coal power station and the health problems from the turbines are more harmful than the coal equivalent. Please bring on an early election
11/06/2015 8:45:23 PM

In the US, they have been using wind power for a long time. As someone who has lived on a farm my whole life, and who studied agriculture and then sustainability, I am sometimes so ashamed of the arrogance and ignorance displayed in the comments on pages like this. Do you really know what is at stake here? . e-US-Could-Run-Exclusively-on-Ren ewable-Energy-By-2050/articleshow /47621611.cms..
11/06/2015 11:20:43 PM

What rubbish. Wind turbines are meant to generate power, not look nice. To all these people who complain about the visual or health impact of turbines, I ask how would you feel about having a coal powered power station built next to you? This is far more about pandering to not in my backyard than legitimate complaints. All inferstructure has to be in someone's back yard, and if there's no wind farm next to your place, there's a coalfire station to replace it next to someone else. Who knows? One day it could even be next to you!
1 | 2 | 3 | 4  |  next >


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who