Extension vital for ongoing study

10 Jan, 2018 04:00 AM
Esperance farmer Chris Reichstein believes good ag extension is critical to getting the best return on research and development dollars.
Esperance farmer Chris Reichstein believes good ag extension is critical to getting the best return on research and development dollars.

A NUFFIELD Scholar, who researched the best way to convey scientific research back to farmers, said effective extension was critical in getting the best return on investment from agricultural research and development (R and D).

Esperance farmer Chris Reichstein said top quality research lost its value if it did not translate to uptake in the paddock.

“You can’t lose sight of that human factor and ensuring the message is presented to farmers in a fashion to suit everyone’s learning styles,” Mr Reichstein said.

He said he was happy with how the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) was allocating its funds in terms of the split between research and extension.

“There is money going towards extension, towards people on the ground, and I think that is critical.”

Mr Reichstein also felt that the GRDC was listening to growers in the development of research priorities.

“I think initiatives like the regional panels and the regional cropping solutions network are good in terms of ensuring farmers can talk about what their research priorities are,” he said.

“It is a good thing as even though Australia is home to some of the world’s best R and D, especially in agriculture, it has typically embraced the top down model, which tends to be supply driven and directed by those off-farm like scientists and external organisations.

“More work with growers on what research they want will always be welcomed and there seems to be have been a concerted shift in this direction.”

Mr Reichstein said he toured the world as part of the scholarship and found a range of different systems in terms of R, D and E.

“In the US, for example, it is very comprehensive and there is also a lot of involvement from the private companies,” he said.

“I don’t think Australian growers would like to have chemical and biotech businesses involved in the day-to-day agronomy of their crop like often happens in the US.”

Mr Reichstein also said much of the research direction came from the top down, as opposed to being grower-driven.

He said Ireland, New Zealand and Argentina all had strong cultures of grower-driven research and collaborative learning.

Mr Reichstein said getting the format of the information right for the individual grower was critical.

“For farmers there are varied barriers to learning and adoption of innovation be they cultural, economic, social, political or attitude to risk or past experience, when research identifies potential change to benefit our systems we need to ask what are the impediments to adoption and tailor the message in such a way as to cater for individual farmers need,” he said.

“Learning about the latest in R and D shouldn’t be a one-size fits all approach.

“It needs to be delivered to growers in a multitude of ways including face-to-face, written and online education.”



Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who