Hot air over wind farms

17 Jun, 2015 02:00 AM
Comments
11
 
He likes Picasso, I like Dali - everybody has their own views on these things

ENVIRONMENT Minister Greg Hunt is ambivalent about wind farms but Prime Minister Tony Abbott believes they are “visually awful”, make too much noise and the number must be reduced.

In an interview with Sydney radio broadcaster Alan Jones, Mr Abbott was quizzed about the government’s recent deal with the Labor Party to downsize the Renewable Energy Target (RET) and current Senate select committee inquiry into wind farms.

The Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000 legislation now before the Senate will adjust the RET down to 33,000 gigawatt hours of electricity in 2020, from the current mark of 41,000 gigawatt hours.

In reference to its impact on wind farms, Mr Abbott said the government would “reduce the number of these things that we are going to get in the future”.

“Now, I would frankly have liked to reduce the number a lot more,” he said.

Mr Abbott said the proximity of “these things” (wind farms) to people’s dwellings was an important issue, but something for State governments to deal with.

“When I have been up close to these windfarms there’s no doubt not only are they visually awful but they make a lot of noise.”

Mr Jones referred to an article last week by NSW Liberal Democrat Senator David Leyonhjelm which said it was “beyond dispute that wind turbines emit infrasound and low frequency noise”.

“It is well established that inappropriate levels of infrasound, regardless of the source, cause adverse health impacts,” Mr Jones said in quoting the Senator’s article.

But when asked about Mr Abbott’s comments, Mr Hunt said, “I'm less fussed about these things - that's the honest answer”.

“You know, he likes Picasso, I like Dali,” he said.

“Everybody has their own views on these things but there shouldn't be any problem with people expressing those views.”

Mr Hunt said many people were concerned about wind farms and “have a right to be heard without those who don’t live with them in their backyards deriding them”.

He said wind farms were part of the reduced RET but solar was also becoming increasingly competitive.

“The whole purpose of this target is to achieve a certain renewable energy outcome for Australia - 23.5 per cent by 2020 - and then to let the different forms of renewable energy compete and solar’s becoming more competitive each day,” he said.

Asked about the health impacts of wind farms, Mr Hunt said there was a Senate assessment underway and “I won’t try to pre-empt that” or an assessment being omission by the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Asked how much damage the Prime Minister’s comments had caused the wind farm industry, Mr Hunt said “none”.

“We inherited a catastrophic mess from the ALP,” he said.

“The ALP ignored our warnings just like pink batts, just like green loans, just like cash for clunkers.

“They came up with a wacky idea for phantom credits and it led to chaos in the industry and if we had not taken steps what we would have seen was the industry go to penalty price and for Australians, for people here, that would have meant an effective $93 per tonne carbon tax.

“So we took steps to clean up Labor’s mess.

“They got their policy wrong, they got their projections wrong on electricity, they created phantom credits for renewable energy which was never actually generated.”

Later in the week, Mr Abbott spoke of his personal experience with a wind farm while cycling around Rottnest Island a few years ago, off the coast near Perth.

“My path took me almost directly under the big wind turbine which has been on Rottnest Island for some time,” he said.

“Now, up close, they are ugly, they are noisy and they may have all sorts of other impacts which I will leave to the scientists to study and that's why I think it's right and proper that state governments should have increased the distance from habitations that these installations now need to keep.

“It's right and proper that we are having an inquiry into the health impacts of these things.

“Frankly, it's right and proper that we have reduced the RET because as things stood, there was going to be an explosion of these things right around our country.

“There will still be some growth, but it will be much less than it would otherwise have been thanks to measures that this government has taken.”

But Tasmanian Labor Senator Anne Urquhart, who is a member of the Senate select inquiry, labelled the Prime Minister’s comments ‘totally baseless’ and ‘completely unsupported by expert evidence provided to the committee’.

“There have been 25 reviews into the issue across the globe and not one has found evidence that wind farms are detrimental to human health,” she said.

“There’s a growing body of credible research which shows that exposure to anti-wind messages can have a significant impact on people’s perceptions of the impacts of wind farms on their health.

“The Prime Minister’s words will only serve to increase anxiety in regional communities and create uncertainty in an industry that offers billions of dollars of investment and thousands of jobs.

“Yet again the Prime Minister is completely misrepresenting the facts in order to further his vicious war on renewable energy.”

Senator Urquhart’s comments reflected statements by Climate Council Councillor Professor Will Steffen, who said there was no consistent evidence that wind farms caused adverse health effects.

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Paul
17/06/2015 5:22:48 AM

Lets get rid of those ugly wind turbines. Coal mines and power stations are far more attractive.
T Rex
17/06/2015 1:44:43 PM

Mr Abbott please tear down these ugly eyesores. ( apologies to R Reagan ).
Happy Farmer
17/06/2015 3:11:30 PM

Absolutely right. Open cut coal mines and coal industry pollution is far less of a health and visual impact where they dont threaten canberran politicians bike rides...
newbroom
17/06/2015 3:26:24 PM

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamenta ry_Business/Committees/Senate/Win d_Turbines/Wind_Turbines let us see. Upcoming Public Hearings 19 Jun 2015: Canberra, ACT 23 Jun 2015: Canberra, ACT 29 Jun 2015: Sydney, NSW Past Public Hearings 10 Jun 2015: Adelaide, SA 09 Jun 2015: Melbourne, VIC 19 May 2015: Canberra, ACT
Invey
17/06/2015 5:34:07 PM

Build them in the cities and it won't matter how many cash for comment scientific reports say they aren't a health issue. The reason they are not built in the cities is they are bad for the environment and health and they know it. The other reason is the NSW state Government rubber stamped the approval in rural areas because they don't care if our farms are devalued and our health suffers. I think we are all sick of hypocrites on here sprouting about wind and coal but don't live near either. Give me a tree too look at over a turbine any day.
Jacky
18/06/2015 6:52:54 AM

So the science used in climate change modelling is rubbish but the 'science' in wind farm effects on those not being compensated is solid?
Bel
18/06/2015 8:19:24 AM

Greg Hunt is right in "many people were concerned about wind farms and “have a right to be heard without those who don’t live with them in their backyards deriding them”. People effected by wind turbines are not pro-coal! They just want to be able to live in their homes and hopefully soon people in the cities will start to realise this.
HQ
18/06/2015 9:33:54 AM

You got the first half of your statement dead right Jacky.
newbroom
18/06/2015 11:48:10 AM

It is being reviewed and some of the submissions are well written and points articulated clearly. It is clear that "wind farms" are an issue. I think Invey has a good point. Just try and whack one in the electorate of Sydney or electorate of Melbourne (Green held seat).
genie81
19/06/2015 8:06:48 AM

The German Medical Authority has stopped all developments until further research is done. Why is it that the wind industry knew in the 1980s that there was problems yet kept quiet about it. How many countries are now looking for other renewables? How many birds have been killed and how many humans?
1 | 2  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who