Keeping the bastards honest

14 Mar, 2015 01:00 AM
Comments
12
 
Pete Mailler wants rural politics to focus on problem-solving, not
If Mr Mailler was just a hick with a limp, though, he wouldn’t have burred up the National Party
Pete Mailler wants rural politics to focus on problem-solving, not "posturing".

ASKED to describe himself, Country Party co-founder Peter Mailler laconically offers: “Fat one-legged farmer from Boggabilla”.

He is indeed one-legged, after complications from a bout with cancer at two led to his right leg being amputated at 15.

With limited ability to exercise, Mr Mailler also tends towards what a livestock agent might describe as “forward condition”, although not unusually so in the 43-year-old farmer demographic.

And he does farm west of Boggabilla, in northern NSW, growing grain and raising cattle on 1400 hectares with his wife Clare, a vet, and their four children aged from six to 15.

“When people tell me I can’t do something, my reaction is, ‘don’t tell me what I can’t do’”

If Mr Mailler was just a hick with a limp, though, he wouldn’t have burred up the National Party.

Across the black soil plain is the farm his father bought and paid for by sharefarming, and where his brother Rob devised Beeline, the world’s first GPS-guided auto-steer system.

Mr Mailler doubts whether either of those projects would be possible under the merciless economics of farming today. It’s partly those economics that have pushed him into politics.

That’s the other side of the farmer from Boggabilla: an inability to sit on the sidelines if a problem appears in front of him. It’s the sort of mindset someone might develop after the loss of a leg.

“When people tell me I can’t do something, my reaction is, ‘don’t tell me what I can’t do’,” Mr Mailler said.

That determination is supported by a good mind. He trained as a research scientist, taking his Agricultural Science degree at the University of Queensland in 1992.

“You work out what the problem is,” he said of academia, “and then you work out how to solve the problem.”

A healthy dose of political cynicism

Then he encountered politics, which complicates such straightforward reasoning. From 2009-12, Mr Mailler was chairman of Conservation Farmers, and from 2010-2013, chairman of the peak body Grain Producers Australia (GPA). At GPA, he discovered that politics and problem-solving are not necessarily the same thing.

Spending time in Canberra as the leader of the grains industry, Mr Mailler recalled one incident “that really got up my nose”.

GPA was arguing for a more nuanced outcome from the Wheat Export Market Amendment Bill 2012, the legislation that removed the wheat marketing single desk. Underlying that flagship issue, Mr Mailler said, was the more complex question of whether monopolies could manipulate the supply chain to the detriment of farmers.

With some exceptions (he cites Bill Heffernan, Sean Edwards, Chris Back) “the Coalition basically said it couldn’t write legislation from Opposition - which was not true - so they couldn’t declare a position if they were elected”.

“So we saw the Bill pass because the Greens lost patience with the Coalition. That was purely political posturing. We had an opportunity to get it right, but because the Coalition wouldn’t work with the Greens overtly, and they wouldn’t work with (Independent MP) Tony Windsor, even though Windsor had legislation that would have worked, the ability to change things died.

“When I spent time in Canberra, I got more support from Rachel Siewert, the Greens ag spokesperson, and Independent Nick Xenophon than I got from the National Party.”

Confronted with a new problem - politics - Mr Mailler’s first approach to solving it was to join the Katter’s Australian Party and stand for the Senate in the 2013 federal election.

He didn’t win the ticket, perhaps fortunately, because he stood thinking that “maybe we could bend the movement into an alternative voice for rural Australia”.

Instead, he found, “It’s really about Katter culture, and that’s intractable”.

“We need a political mechanism to remind people that they are part of an agricultural economy”

Then “five blokes on the phone” conceived the Country Party. It was meant to be an under-the-radar effort until closer to the 2016 federal elections, Mr Mailler said, but within 24 hours of determining the Party would be a thing, Fairfax Agricultural Media’s politics writer Col Bettles was on the phone.

“Then Barnaby Joyce gave us a spray, and we became legitimate.”

Mr Mailler - who writes a regular blog for FarmOnline - isn’t putting himself forward as a candidate: it’s the best way he can think of to make the point that the Country Party isn’t about him.

It’s a party, not a confederation of independents, because he thinks forming a party is the only way to get cut-through.

“The concessions that (Independent) Tony Windsor won from (Julia) Gillard were great, but no-one ever recognised them.”

“For us, the end game is getting better political advocacy. If the Nationals turn into what we want, we’ll have no role. It’s about forcing the change, or being the change.”

Some days Mr Mailler is optimistic; some days he despairs at whether entrenched structures and expectations can really be shaken by “five blokes on a phone”.

It’s early days, though, and Mr Mailler is already sure of one thing. “We’ve got done in eight weeks more than we thought we’d get done in eight months.”

A work in progress

The fledgling Country Party may yet not get enough support to form a party, and if it does, may not be go by that name.

Pete Mailler won’t name the other four blokes. They are working within their own communities or sectors, he said, and he doesn’t want them to cop the political backlash he encountered when he stood for the Katter Party.

Trying to place the Country Party in the political spectrum isn’t as easy as it might appear. It might be thought of as “progressive conservative”, or hark back to a time when conservatism was less allied to right-wing ideology.

Mr Mailler insists that the Party’s sole purpose is to solve problems, independent of political ideology.

“It’s about applying pressure to reform and respond better to the electorate”

Some of the problems it recognises, like the cost-price squeeze on agriculture and the decay of rural communities, tend to be the traditional domain of the political Right.

“We need a political mechanism to remind people that they are part of an agricultural economy,” Mr Mailler said. “If you eat food, then you’re ultimately part of the agricultural enterprise.”

On other issues, like climate change and renewable energy - and more innovative energy policy in general - the group is talking about matters that tend to be championed by the Left.

But for the Country Party’s founders, Mr Mailler said, the primary concern is to provide a sound future for their children in a time when a sober assessment of trends in climate, population and resources points to a rough ride for future generations.

Whether the Country Party has a go at reckoning with that future is still uncertain, as it fights to become an entity rather than an idea.

It is still short of the 500 paid-up members it needs to register as a political party, although Mr Mailler said if current growth trends continue, it should be registered by the federal elections.

It also hasn’t secured its name, although Mr Mailler is pragmatic.

“It was useful for pissing off the Nationals. It’s not about the name, though: it’s about applying pressure to reform and respond better to the electorate.”

Although the group formed to contest the 2016 federal election, it supports aligned Independent candidates contesting the NSW State seats of Northern Tablelands and Murrumbidgee - both Nationals-held - in the March 2015 NSW elections.

It also supports the campaign of non-aligned Independent Rohan Boehm in Barwon, another Nationals seat.

Success is unlikely to be a win in any of the seats, Mr Mailler acknowledges. Instead, the group is measuring success on how much pressure it applies to Nationals incumbents by providing “a safe place” to park a protest vote.

“If we can erode a sitting Nationals member’s vote from 86 per cent to 56pc, then his seat becomes marginal - and suddenly he’s got a whole lot more reach when he goes into bat in Macquarie St.”

FarmOnline
Matthew Cawood

Matthew Cawood

is the national science and environment writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

reasontovote
14/03/2015 9:56:45 AM

This article underlines the need to vote Country Party if you care about agriculture
the advocate
15/03/2015 10:18:48 AM

just wondering what was good about Windsor - seem to remember him trying to say that the carbon tax was good for rural Australia; and he was missing in action when his mates banned the live export trade which caused decimation in pastoral areas, and also in the Indonesian beef industry as well! I was thinking of joining this party until i read the comments about Windsor plus the concluding paragraph. - are they going to be wreckers like Clive Palmer and just smooth the way for a Labor win!
Ted O'Brien..
18/03/2015 8:15:17 AM

What is really needed is for the National Party to accommodate Pete Mailler. The problem which makes it necessary for Pete Mailler to seek a better solution is the same problem that saw Tony Windsor leave the National Party so many years ago. It hasn't gone away. It has over that period halved the number of farmers in Australia, and created an economic situation that will see many more leaving in the near future. All of which, it should be noted, is Greens policy.
watson
18/03/2015 8:48:55 AM

Ted, I disagree with you on PM joining the national party Ted. Its the party/coalition hym book that stuffs them up. Recently a coalition party "hanger on" was talking about how they had "pulled Barnaby back into line", that says it all to me. These guys can say all the right things till elected, then its about party politics and not their views. Interestingly the party hanger on also vehemently opposed the single desk I was told last nite. The answer to the problem nobody has, but all seem to become puppets when they get elected. The best they can do is be independent, not beholden to parties
Ted O'Brien.
21/03/2015 4:08:53 PM

Watson, you are so right. But it would be so much easier if the Nationals came to their senses than to have to do it by fighting them all the way. The number of people who have dumped the National Party would far exceed the current membership. My call for the Nationals to accommodate PM is a call for policy change.
Maxine
8/09/2015 5:55:53 AM

I have just heard Pete Mailler talk on the radio with Alan Jones. You have made my day Pete! a voice of common sence and hope - I wish you all the goodluck , keep up the good work of informing the public and our Polititions.
Concerned
8/09/2015 3:27:36 PM

Maxine, you are bang on! This guy is the real deal. The problem with this country is its run from a desk and not from people busting their backsides like this guy. I am not a country person but I love getting away in the country. I was just in his home town last week. I didn't know of him until this morning but boy I do now. All the best mate, you are standing up for what is right and your honest. Don't loose sight and stay as you are. Your a champ. Finally a businessman with a physical working ethic.
freetradeessential
8/09/2015 3:48:15 PM

media tart of one with big hat and nothing under it and just using whining do nothings to foster yet another useless waste of space in parliament.
Percy
8/09/2015 8:35:56 PM

The original Country Party deserted the farmers to pander to mining interests and now that mining is on the skids they want to pander to those few farmers we have left on the land. Any wonder the now named Nationals are concerned about some opposition because rural folk have long memories and do not forgive easily. Time for a real rural voice but sadly since one-vote one-value was introduced then that is not likely to happen. The voice of rational Country folk like the whole country is just about stuffed. Real integrity displayed by party members would win votes if the press reported that.
Methuen Morgan
9/09/2015 11:25:44 AM

Wow Freetradeessential. That comment is a big call. I assume you know the bloke. Yes he has a big hat many rural folk do so no surprise there. Just whining and doing nothing. Really?? Did you read the article? Apart from actually putting his hand in his own pocket to help set a party, along with all his other contibutions to agri-politics he has a commercial farming operation. What else would you like him to do? Turn water into wine for you! He is atleast having a go. I for one await you listing what the hell you are doing - apart from making such comments from the comfort of anonymity.
1 | 2  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who