Choice is key in GM debate

14 Feb, 2015 01:00 AM
A trial crop of GM canola.
We need to ensure complacency does not set in and that we continue to innovate
A trial crop of GM canola.

Daniel Kruithoff is managing director, Monsanto Australia and New Zealand.

OPINION: AGRICULTURE is once again at the forefront of the national conversation about Australia’s future prosperity. Having ridden the mining boom all the way to shore, sectors such as agriculture are being viewed as the next wave of economic growth.

Improved market access through free trade agreements will undoubtedly help drive demand for Australia’s high quality food and fibre, particularly among the booming middle class of Asia.

What is less certain though is the capacity of Australian agriculture to sustainably increase productivity fast enough to capitalise on the opportunity of becoming a food bowl for Asia.

Australian farmers have historically tackled productivity challenges including rising production costs, climate variability and increasing global competition through adopting the latest science, technology and management practices.

This record has served us well. However, we need to ensure complacency does not set in and that we continue to innovate our agricultural production systems.

Genetically modified (GM) crops are a case in point.

Since the introduction of agricultural biotechnology in 1996, Australian GM cotton and canola growers have generated an extra $760 million in income, according to an international report published by PG Economics.

Agricultural biotechnology has also helped Australia become one of the world’s most sustainable and productive cotton producers by reducing the industry’s insecticide use by more than 90 per cent since 1996. Along with other technological advances and improvements in management techniques, GM technology has contributed to local cotton growers producing yields almost three times the world average.

The rapid adoption of GM canola varieties on the east and west coasts is helping local farmers increase yield and lower their carbon footprint. Last season, canola growers purchased 55pc more GM canola seed than the previous season and we are expecting this strong growth in adoption to continue.

Globally, farmers have turned to GM crops in greater numbers every year since their introduction 19 years ago. About 18 million farmers in 28 countries planted GM crops last year.

Which is why farmers in South Australia and Tasmania would be better off if they at least had the choice to plant the GM crops that a growing number of their counterparts on the east and west coasts benefit from.

All States market their produce as ‘clean and green’. However, farmers in Queensland, NSW, Victoria and Western Australia have the added benefit of being allowed to use a proven technology now grown, imported and/or used in field research trials in 70 countries.

The world’s most sophisticated regulatory systems, respected universities, international agencies such as the World Health Organisation overwhelmingly conclude that GM crops are safe and environmentally friendly.

Globally, farmers have turned to GM crops in greater numbers every year since their introduction 19 years ago. About 18 million farmers in 28 countries planted GM crops last year to improve their yields, sustainability and incomes.

Now more than ever we need to equip Australian farmers with the innovative tools they need to be able to meet society’s growing expectations about how their food is produced and its impact on the environment.

And we have every reason to be optimistic about the sector’s capacity to meet local and international consumer demands and to feed a rapidly growing global population.

Australia’s long history of being able to use different production systems has improved the success and sustainability of local agriculture. Our advanced agriculture sector has allowed organic, conventional and GM crops to be successfully grown side-by-side in Australia for many years.

Based on this enviable record, farmers and consumers alike can be assured that local agriculture is successfully providing the choice in crops and food they expect.

Our farmers need a wide variety of tools, including GM crops, to produce the high quality food and fibre that they are world renowned for and that we rely upon everyday. The challenge of sustainably producing the food we consume or export will be overcome as it always has – by our farmers embracing agricultural innovation.

Date: Newest first | Oldest first


14/02/2015 7:41:29 AM

Perfectly sensible article but will not be acceptable to the quasi religious anti GM fanatics. This assemblage of the mad deep greens, environmentalists and organic industry zealots, all conspiring against proven fact and science, will continue to perpetuate myth , fear and falsehoods. Tragically aided by populist misguided politicians who should be better than that eg SA. But maybe there is hope for the SA farmer, Jay now likes uranium.
15/02/2015 4:23:59 PM

Ask Canadian farmers how much choice they have after a number of years of the big companies buying up smaller canola breeders, canola seed prices have increased to the point where Canadian farmers are talking a lot about its impact on their businesses. Its not that different to supermarket power being in a limited number of large multi national companies hands. I can see no health issue with GM crops other than the long term financial health of farmers world wide become defacto employees of the seed companies. If you control one link in the chain you can control the chain.
16/02/2015 8:31:30 AM

Graingrower , the is little chance that in the long term a few large companies will control the seed market and charge farmers exorbitant prices for seeds. Farmers can grow their own seed and enterprising small agricultural businesses could move into the field. Further, governments could act to ensure that competition is available in the seeds market.
16/02/2015 10:21:53 AM

Where is my choice regarding GM, if I grow conventional canola and my neighbour GM, I will inevitably end up with GM contam? Regarding intellectual property, I remember hearing about $350 roundup drums, what will happen when a company owns the solution to your roundup resistance u are now developing? will they have market capture. Daniel, it is not complacent to question GM, as there is considerable evidence to the contrary regarding its safety and the regulation allowing its approval is fundamentally flawed, as it presents a conflict of interest for companies developing it to safety test it.
16/02/2015 10:47:57 AM

I have also read about a GM corn that was developed as a contraception by isolating genes and making sperm too heavy to move. If people think only good genes can be inserted, they are naïve. If we tried to test our foods for such material, how would we know what to look for? I don't know if the corn is true or not, however there is a diff bw GM and traditional breeding, they can knowingly insert genes, good or bad. I also have a question Daniel, Is it permissible for independent scientists to test monsantos patented crops for cross pollination without their approval, as research is v deficient
17/02/2015 1:43:26 PM

Still no answer from u Daniel regarding use of patented DNA in independent testing? does Monsanto answer questions?
19/02/2015 12:16:46 PM

have a look at the article below, remember that the FDA is the body who approves GMOs as safe based on industry self evaluation. While we are at it, do a critical review of the concentration in media ownership in the US and have a think. _science/science/2015/02/fda_insp ections_fraud_fabrication_and_sci entific_misconduct_are_hidden_fro m.single.html


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who