Dispelling the Nationals post-election propaganda.

28 Jul, 2016 12:08 PM
CountryMinded party leader Pete Mailler on the election campaign trail this year.
CountryMinded party leader Pete Mailler on the election campaign trail this year.

Anyone would be forgiven for thinking they alone won the election for the Coalition - but the results speak to a very different outcome and one that should inspire a bit more contrition than is currently being displayed.

Leader Barnaby Joyce has claimed an increase in his party’s vote is some sort of vindication of its performance, but it belies what’s really happening.

The biggest impact on the National’s vote was in the seat of Murray where it gained a seat by running against the Liberals and winning when former Member Sharman Stone retired after 20-years, opening up a three-cornered contest.

Any votes in Murray were a gain in that electorate and clearly in looking for a fresh change rural voters favoured the National’s candidate Damian Drum.

Congratulations are due in Murray to be sure but this is no indication of a universal increase in popularity or any kind of broad endorsement that would or should silence critics of the Nationals’ performance.

The despair in their performance is profound, particularly in relation to the promotion of mining while failing to protect agricultural land and water in the same landscape.

While the Nationals had a swing of 0.5 per cent in the overall primary vote across 16 Lower House seats, that result was largely due to a 36.2pc positive swing in Murray.

Taking into account the redrawing of electoral boundaries, seats like Cowper in NSW experienced a -8.5pc result in the two party preferred vote and -5.7pc in the electorate of Flynn in Queensland.

In all but three of the 16 seats, the Nationals saw swings away from their candidate on the primary vote and all but two seats saw negative swings on a two party preferred basis.

Setting aside Murray as an outlier due to its anomalous nature, the general trend of the Nationals support is negative.

In most seats there was no effective conservative competition, except in New England and Murray and perhaps Cowper.

As a close observer of the New England campaign, the resources poured into it by the Nationals and other supporters of Mr Joyce was verging on the obscene in its excess.

Mr Joyce’s campaign cost will not be covered by his refund from the AEC and that does not include the in-kind man hours also provided to him.

The reality is that the Nationals have seen an ongoing erosion of support that is only checked at this stage by the fact the electorate has not yet seen a credible alternative to vote for.

That is not to say that there is not one - just that it has not yet been recognised.

Looking at the Nationals’ 16 seats in terms of margin which is the strongest indicator of motivation for incumbent Members of Parliament, on a two party preferred basis:

- Six are now marginal on less than 6pc.

- Eight seats are considered safe with a margin between 6-12pc.

- Two seats remain very safe down from eight in the previous parliament.

Mr Joyce’s immediate post-election posturing has an air of arrogance about it as he chides the senior Coalition party and seemingly ignores the profound message the electorate is sending.

The one good thing is that there are an increasing number of marginal Nationals seats in regional Australia.

This is excellent news for those electorates because MPs in marginal seats work harder and deliver more for their electorates as a matter of political survival.

Similarly, the smart ones use their marginal status to get more attention from both sides of the parliament because their electorates are important strategically in the counts to form government.

The reality is the Nationals have held the balance of power in one House or another and failed to use it effectively for decades.

They have been an ineffective voice for regional Australia because they have chosen to hide in Coalition.

They do not even contest the Senate independently and have failed to provide equitable advocacy for regional Australia and win public and private sector investment befitting our real contribution to the nation’s wealth.

Time alone will tell if the 2016 election forces any cultural change in the major parties, Nationals included.

The early rhetoric is that Mr Joyce is not heeding the warning from the grass roots as he fails to recognise that nearly half his party seats have lost very safe status and a fifth have become marginal.

The biggest risk facing regional Australia is that the electorate finally elects unknown wildcard parties or candidates in protest because the Nationals fail to genuinely reform and return to their roots in deed as well as word.

In some respects, this is already happening in the Senate.

In the meantime, CountryMinded continues to build the solid foundation for the safe and credible political alternative that understands the critical importance of viable and vibrant regions to the prosperity of the entire Nation and is willing to fight for it.

Watch this space.

Pete Mailler

Pete Mailler

is a farmer on the Qld/NSW border and a co-founder of the Country Party of Australia
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


Mabel Peyton-Smyth
28/07/2016 1:27:36 PM

In your analysis you forgot Indi where the Nationals ran after many years They achieved 18 per cent of the vote after touting widely they could win. Of course the Indi vote boosted the overall figure. Any sane person should be happy Narnaby won his seat
angry australian
29/07/2016 7:48:53 AM

Pete you also missed 15,527 votes for Marty Corboy in Indi because Sophie made it a 3 corner by losing it in the last election. So add Marty's votes into your equation and the Nats were actually way down. It's clear, rural Australia is not happy with the menu the Nationals are dishing up with their Liberal mates!
30/07/2016 3:41:01 PM

Maybe its about time the Nationals unhitched their caravan from the Liberal Party on its current basis and only looked at its relationship at the end of each election?
John Niven
31/07/2016 8:47:47 AM

About 30 seats from 76 in Senate will hardly be in control. Tough work I know Pete but your effort and preferences have helped others.
Jock Munro
1/08/2016 7:54:36 AM

Pete should stop trying to split the conservative vote - he could even try becoming a member of the Nationals and attending a conference and joining in on the debates. He also try pushing through his policy ideas in a very democratic process.
1/08/2016 9:06:42 AM

sorry mate, give it away. We have enough decimal point dills hanging around the frustrate democracy. Senate with its edgits and 12 senators for Tasmania and only 5 house seats. Trashing of representative voting and no wonder we go backwards. We do not need your purile analysis.
Raisor W.A.
2/08/2016 6:56:29 PM

Pete, Your commentary did not include the West where the Nats were well and truly flogged.Beaten easily by the Liberal candidates and even out voted by Labor in O'Conner & Durack (both rural seats)for the Lower House. In the Senate beaten by One Nation & The Greens. I reckon there is a message here Pete.???!!!
4/08/2016 6:33:33 AM

Jock, u are dreaming. All they do is talk the talk prior to politics, then do nothing, blaming it on the party. There is no left and right, they get their orders and engage in daily banter to pretend there is a difference and that u have democracy. What have the nationals delivered on? foreign investment, grain marketing, farm affordability, etc - absolutely nothing of significance. The policies of both sides have destroyed industry in this country since Hawke - dereg, privatisation, foreign invest/funding have exposed us to a debt fuelled bubble that there is no escaping. Do u not see this?


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who