Economic report signals end for GM barriers

06 Jun, 2016 12:28 PM
Comments
5
 
CropLife Australia CEO Matthew Cossey calling for the removal of State based restrictions on plant biotechnology.
CropLife Australia CEO Matthew Cossey calling for the removal of State based restrictions on plant biotechnology.

RESULTS of a new economic report, showing Genetically Modified crops have increased farmer incomes by $1.37 billion in Australia since 1996 while drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions, reinforces why unnecessary State-based moratoria should end, supporters say.

An independent report released today by Graham Brookes of UK-based PG Economics says in the past 20-years, Australian cotton and canola farmers have gained $1.37b worth of extra income and produced an additional 226,000 tonnes of canola that would otherwise have not been produced, if conventional technology was used.

It also said GM crop technology has enabled Australian farmers to reduce their use of insecticides and herbicides by 22 million kilograms of active ingredient, equal to a 26 per cent improvement in the environmental impact associated with pesticide use on the two crops.

“This reduced use of pesticides has also resulted in a saving of nearly 27 million litres of fuel use and 71.5 million kilograms less carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere,” it said.

The report said in 1996, 1.66 million hectares of crops containing GM traits were planted globally including 40,000 ha in Australia.

In 2015, the global planted area was about 180 m/ha including 714,000ha in Australia with 270,000ha cotton and 444,000ha canola.

Of the $1.37b increased farm income, $1.14b is attributed to GM insect resistant cotton with the increase from GM herbicide tolerant canola was $98.9 million.

CropLife Australia said the 20 year record of success for GM crop cultivation in Australia was also confirmation that time was up for antiquated and entirely unnecessary state-based moratoria on GM crops.

CropLife Australia CEO Matthew Cossey said the rapid adoption of GM crops was evidence of farmers seeing the clear financial, agronomic and environmental benefits modern crop breeding innovation provides.

“It is also evident that State-based moratoria on GM crop cultivation serve no purpose other than to stifle innovation and in some cases act as a political football for people who blatantly refuse to acknowledge the real-world benefits GM crops provide to farmers and the nation,” he said.

“GM cotton is credited as being the saviour of Australia’s cotton industry with Australian farmers among the first in the world to plant GM cotton seeds in 1996 and herbicide tolerant canola has been successfully grown in Australia since 2008 with almost 40pc of WA’s canola growers choosing GM crops.

“Many more farmers choose to grow GM canola as a rotation crop to help manage weed issues in other crops such as wheat and barley.

“It’s about time state policy settings are supportive of Australian farmers and their right to choose to reap the well-established benefits of GM crops.”

Mr Cossey said in the face of numerous benefits for GM crops in Australia, as shown in the report, “State-based moratoria just doesn’t make sense”.

“A truly productive and competitive agriculture sector that can sustainably contribute to food security challenges in a changing climate requires farmer access to modern farming technologies,” he said.

“Australian farmers deserve to have confidence in their choice of safe and approved crops and it is time that public policies for GM crops are based on facts and evidence, not political game-playing or ideologically driven scare campaigns.”

Last week, with the federal election in full swing leading into July 2, the National Farmers’ Federation demanded all sides of politics adopt policies that allow Australian farmers to be world leaders in innovation.

NFF President Brent Finlay said beyond improving digital connectivity and telecommunications in the regions, governments must also support continued agricultural innovation by progressing efforts to phase out of State-based moratoria on GM crops.

He said that would provide farmers with greater production choice and options to improve their productivity.

Monsanto Australia and NZ Managing Director Tony May also welcomed the PG Economics report saying supportive federal and State policy settings, along with cross-sector collaboration, were essential to encourage scientific and technological breakthroughs.

“Almost all of the cotton grown in Australia contains GM technology and is credited by the cotton industry as being crucial to drastically reducing chemical use, improving water management and enhancing the industry’s viability,” he said.

“Imagine the impact on rural economies and the environment had local farmers not been able to grow genetically enhanced cotton seeds for the past 20 years.”

Mr May said Australian farmers were among the first in the world to plant genetically enhanced cotton seeds in 1996, while herbicide tolerant canola was first grown in NSW and Victoria in 2008 and the country’s largest grain producing State, WA, followed in 2010.

He said herbicide tolerant canola is grown by almost 40pc of WA canola growers.

“Growing consumer acceptance of GM technology and the need to sustainably improve food security in developing countries is driving the adoption of GM crops across our region,” he said.

“This trend was reinforced by China’s recent announcement that it intends to encourage a large increase in the development and planting of GM crops.

“The last 20 years have also shown that farmers can successfully grow organic, conventional and GM crops side-by-side.

“This has allowed farmers in states on Australia’s east and west coasts that allow GM crops to be grown to benefit from the latest technology, as well as market their produce as ‘clean and green’ in international markets.”

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

full stomach
6/06/2016 1:46:24 PM

U create fear about food security as a reason for GM tech. How do u explain Venezuelas current food riots in a time of so called overproduction of food? People are breaking into houses and supermarkets to get food, creating oversupply will just give the few, more power over the rest. Why are most GM crops used in subsidised ethanol and cotton, whilst we have people starving? Why is India growing cotton when they need food? the simple answer is, GM gives greater control to vested interests who have fiduciary duties to shareholders, ie they don't care and u misrepresent benefits of GM technology
Full stomach
6/06/2016 1:58:45 PM

Resistance has already being identified to both Bt toxins and Roundup ready in Cotton, so why would countries like Australia allow these technologies to be used up in growing cotton, if there is so much concern for food security into the future? People say they should be allowed choice to grow GM, how do the technical user agreements signed by farmers meet that? Stalins commissars would be proud of the control they give the company over growers, eg access to properties/planting windows/seed etc, I'm perplexed why the same people talk of choice but ridicule the single desk as removing theirs.
Mark2
6/06/2016 4:07:07 PM

What a load of bollocks
wtf
8/06/2016 6:10:52 AM

If u read the PG Economics report it clearly states it was funded by Monsanto, that means it is not independent. Monsanto would have had its choice of scientists to consult (pay per view) and what information was included in the report. To sum it up, this is a Monsanto report under a different name. If Monsanto paid for the report indirectly and had no inclusion into the scientists chosen, as well as no role in the editing then, it would start to appear independent.
wtf
8/06/2016 6:21:13 AM

GM cotton produces an insecticidal toxin, this is produced by the plant every second of the plants life. This report does not even include any calculation of how much of these toxins are produced, its figure would greatly surpass previous applied pesticide levels (savings). If other crops such as soybeans or sorghum had been grown, similar fossil fuel reductions would have been made, especially if there is so much concern over food security. With the TPP and FTAs, distrust in corporations will continue to grow, we as producers should place ourselves in a position to benefit from this.

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who