Katter 'all talk' on rural debt, say Nats

05 Dec, 2014 06:19 AM
They can cry there all they like ... but that is all they will ever be able to do

NATIONAL Party MPs have accused Katter's Australian Party (KAP) of raising serious problems but being politically ineffectual at resolving them.

The war of words erupted ahead of a rural debt crisis meeting being held at Winton in Queensland today.

KAP leader and independent MP Bob Katter has helped organise the meeting but is understood to be angered by federal Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce gate-crashing his event and potentially stealing the limelight.

The forum is expected to attract a large gathering of concerned farmers along with government, banking and industry representatives, and heavyweight radio personality Alan Jones.

Yesterday, National Party MPs indirectly criticised Mr Katter in relation to the Winton event, as the government announced it had committed $100 million to assist Queensland and NSW farmers facing prolonged drought impacts.

Loans of up to $1 million will be made available at 3.21 per cent interest over 10 years to assist farmers with restocking and planting, once the drought breaks.

The announcement in Canberra prompted Queensland LNP MP Bruce Scott to say the organisers of the Winton meeting are unable to fix the actual problems.

“They will cry on the side as independents in the State Parliament and in this place,” he said.

“But it's only from the government benches that you are able to bring forward a package like this.

“They can cry there all they like tomorrow, and the independents will continue to talk about it, but that is all they will ever be able to do.”

Joyce expects catharthis

Mr Joyce said he expected a “cathartic download” at the meeting, in reference to the input of Mr Katter and his son, Queensland MP Rob Katter.

But he said the hardest battle was “where the decision is actually made”.

“Remembering that Agriculture (ministry) is not the Treasury - you have to negotiate and convince your colleagues in Treasury and your colleagues in finance and the Prime Minister of Australia about what is appropriate for your decision because otherwise nothing happens,” he said.

“I can go down to the coffee shop right now and give a great oratory about all the terrible things that are happening and I will be so popular in certain papers and at a certain time on the radio.

“But the problem is that (oratory) is not worth a cup of cold water unless you can deliver on it.”

Mr Joyce said he supported the right of members the fourth estate, like Mr Jones, to ventilate problems like rural debt.

“Their job is to discuss the issues of concern,” he said.

“But sometimes I get a little bit worried or annoyed when you get a clear ventilation of a problem by a person who is in politics but doesn’t want to go into the room to actually try and fix it up.”

Parliamentary war of words

During question time on Wednesday Mr Katter sought to pressure the National Party deputy-leader by asking him to urgently address escalating rural debt.

He said farm debt had blown out from $31 billion in 2003 to $64 billion in 2014 with 30,000 families having exited farming in that period.

He asked the minister if he would restore agricultural bank lending to two per cent and provide four $50 million loans to build an abattoir for the Gulf mid-west.

Mr Katter has also continued demands for the government to establish the Australian Reconstruction and Development Board to help service stressed rural debt, despite the proposal being rejected in the draft Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper.

The KAP leader said this period of drought and debt would be regarded as “the blackest stain on the nation’s history”.

In his response, Mr Joyce said the government had already approved $700 million to support farmers battling drought and debt issues.

“I am going to Winton on Friday to make sure that we remain in contact with those people,” he said.

“We know they are doing it tough.

“We are happy that, at this point in time, they are being blessed with a little bit of rain, and we hope that that continues, because that will assist the cattle prices and assist people getting back onto their feet.

“Under this government, we are turning around agriculture and we are getting the business done.

“I have got $2.45 as the price for live cattle at this point in time at Darwin,” he said.

“That is a classic example of the difference a different government can make.”

For his part, Rob Katter criticised the $100 million drought concessional loans scheme, saying it confirmed the Minister wasn’t serious about saving the farming industry and that he was quick to accuse anyone not in government, of being ineffective.

“It’s been suggested someone should tip him up and shake him to see what will continue to fall out,” he said in a statement.

“In fact it’s not even extra money, but recycled from States that haven’t used the drought concessional loans, because the uptake has been so low, confirming the fact that they are ineffective.

“There is no clear strategy for the structural problem that is rural debt.

“It’s a 30-year-old problem and unless we solve it, we will see the end of the Aussie farmer.”

Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


Frank Blunt
8/12/2014 7:02:42 AM

Big ask Bushfire. The more Bushie bashes us the more we see him for what he is.
8/12/2014 7:16:03 AM

Are the Nats serious? If the Nationals are so effective why are there serious problems left to raise? If Bob cannot fix these serious problems because he doesn't have the balance of power why don't the Nats? Their statements are plainly ridiculous and are just proving to everyone how ineffective the Nationals are because they are in a position to actually help. This 100 million is an absolute joke, we need interest rate subsidies and household support. You cannot change from your bank easily and this won't cost the Govt a thing, they borrow the money for less than they are charging farmers
Rob Moore
8/12/2014 8:28:45 AM

Boris -I assume that you can read -therefore you must be one of those " demonised middle men" who has a vested interest in confusing my PPP effort. Firstly -it was Scott who never had the curtesy to ever follow up! Second "Forcing farmers"- what a siren you are.Producers will have never seen such a smorgasboard of CHOICES on the AUDA "offer board" Complete control by the secondary companies pitching for us to "lock in" - think airline companies (all 2 of them )domestically) and complete choice as to where /if a producer wants to "lock in" a quantity on the offer board.-otherwise-auction simple
Rob Moore
8/12/2014 8:32:08 AM

At Winton.(abc interviews) ...I heard plenty of skirting around the "elephant in the room" ie hopeless farmgate prices for our stock. (1980's prices with 2014 costs) This is the problem and nothing else- we have all fought plenty of droughts before but NEVER have we been put in the vice like this due to the processing / secondary sector ie Kill, Feedlot, Backgrounder or live export being so NON competeing.They just divide up the settled ,desparate supply lines between them. Joyce saying processors have told him that it will be "north of $3 next year"...wow can we have that in writing please.
Michael McCoy
8/12/2014 8:50:29 AM

Katter is a hypocrit and a fraud. I was at the meeting in Winton on Friday, he wasted valuable time, offered no solutions, as usual. He had the hide to say that the cross benchers should walk across the floor now and sack the PM and the Ag. Minister, where was Katter when we went to Canberra, in desperation, to try to sack the worst govt in our history, which he was a part of, for destroying regional Australia as a result of the livex ban, which he was party to. Give us a break Katter, you have no credibility left, please hand over to Noeline Ikin. You have put us in political limbo.
Bushie Bill
8/12/2014 9:02:22 AM

Hey Blondie, it isn't hard unless you are an economic illiterate. Simply ask yourself the question: can "acre out of their pants" dirt scratchers borrow at this rate of interest in the market or do they have to pay more? If they have to pay more, then someone is paying for their discount. It is thus by definition a handout. Do you understand now, Blondie?
Bushie Bill
8/12/2014 9:07:15 AM

Best thing you can do for yourself and the rest of us Robbie, is to quietly sell and shuffle off to the coast, conditional upon you ceasing to flog your ratbag market control garbage publicly.
8/12/2014 9:07:56 AM

I'd like to see a map showing by postcode who owns the $3.2 billion sitting in FMDs.
willy wonka
8/12/2014 10:07:29 AM

are u alluding to the fact that many of those FMDs could be held by ex politicians and corporate world, who own vineyards and other niche agricultural/horticultural enterprises? You are right would be interesting to see the relationship u suggest
angry australian
8/12/2014 10:11:54 AM

Geronimo most probably 80% in 3142 (Toorak) and 2027,2028 (Darling Pt. and Double Bay), and similar suburbs in Melbourne ans Sydney.They are generally the ones who can afford the clever lawyers and accountants to exploit any deficiencies in an Act like this. The other 20% is held by rural farmers who have had a legitimate good year
< previous |  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5  |  next >


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who