Activists MIA in dog fight: Joyce

02 May, 2014 02:00 AM
Never once have I seen them say, ‘we’ll come out into the paddock with you'

FEDERAL Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce says he has a “sense of cynicism” about protestations from animal rights groups over animal cruelty, due to their seeming lack of concern over the “brutalisation” of livestock by wild dogs.

Minister Joyce's comments coincided with the release this week of a new report which highlights the devastation wild dogs wreak on livestock, farmers and rural Australia.

As previously reported by FarmOnline, the report, An integrated assessment of the impact of wild dogs in Australia, by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) confirms wild dogs are a major issue for farmers with economic, social and environmental costs estimated in the millions.

The report examined three case study areas - in south western Queensland, eastern Victoria and South Australia arid lands – and looked at both the market and non-market impacts of wild dogs.

“The fact that wild dogs are running around eating the kidneys out of sheep and leaving them alive until they die of another disease, doesn’t seem to concern them (animal rights groups),” Minister Joyce told Fairfax Agricultural Media.

“Never once have I seen them say, ‘we’ll come out into the paddock with you and we’ll start treating some sheep’.

“They’re not interested in doing that, or saying, ‘we’ll go out and track down some wild dogs and shoot them for you because we know they’re brutalising animals and also brutalising native wild life’.

“You will not have a koala population if you have excessive wild dogs or a wombat population (and) you won’t have any ground birds either.

“But they don’t care about that. Why? Because that would mean they’d actually have to put their money where their mouth is and actually move in that direction.

“But they don’t want to do that - they just want to sit back in Paddington and profess their concern, over their third cappuccino.”

Minister Joyce said more action was needed to control wild dogs because the brutalisation they caused other animals was real.

“I know farmers are frustrated by wild dog attacks, and it’s not just the monetary costs associated with them - it’s also about protecting the livestock which they have put their heart and soul into nurturing and raising,” he said.

“Even the ongoing threat of attack drives farmers to despair and makes them feel helpless in protecting their land that they—and generations before them—have worked hard to farm.

“We know that strong leadership and a coordinated on-the-ground effort is required.”

RSPCA Australia said it recognised wild dogs can cause substantial suffering to livestock when they kill or injure sheep, calves or other young animals.

RSPCA said wild dogs are the subject of a number of control programs around Australia because of their potential to cause environmental and agricultural damage.

“The RSPCA supports a nationally coordinated approach to wild dog control and has been involved in the development of the National Wild Dog Action Plan,” a statement said.

“The RSPCA strongly supports research to develop more humane and effective methods to control wild dogs.”

Animals Australia - which describes itself as the nation’s “foremost national animal protection organisation, representing some 40 member societies and thousands of individual supporters” - was contacted but did not respond before deadline.

Minister Joyce said the challenge facing government was to implement policies and programs that support coordinated wild dog management but in a way that doesn’t compromise investments that farmers have already made in local wild dog control.

He said the Coalition recognised the seriousness of the problem for many farming communities and had provided $10 million for pest management – including wild dogs – as part of the drought package to assist affected farmers.

Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


RSPCA Australia
2/05/2014 8:06:28 AM

RSPCA Australia recognises that wild dogs can cause substantial suffering to livestock and significant distress to farmers when they kill or injure sheep, lambs, calves or other vulnerable animals. The RSPCA has been an active participant in the development of the National Wild Dog Action Plan and strongly supports research to develop more humane and effective methods to control wild dogs. We also work to help inform the community about responsible dog management in peri-urban and rural areas.
2/05/2014 8:08:02 AM

There are plenty of law abiding hunters ready to go out and shoot wild dogs... but government like queensland's lock up state forests and crown lands, meaning that they cannot be as effective. How about you lean on them about that one, Mr Joyce?
David J
2/05/2014 8:14:09 AM

Yep, call it as it is! There's no room for an out-of- balance "nature -chain". Order is what is healthy. Anyone can see this if they want to look
Oz sundown
2/05/2014 8:45:29 AM

Minister Joyce There are thousands of firearm owners willing to help out but places like QLD keep us locked out of State forests. All suitable crown land and National Parks should be open to feral pest eradication similar to the NSW DPI/Game Council model.
2/05/2014 9:14:41 AM

The RSPCA can talk all they like about plans, but it remains nothing more than talk until they start putting in $$ and boots on the ground to solve the problem. The same goes for issues such as the hundreds of thousands of roos that starve to death in every major drought. The RSPCA would prosecute and farmer who let his livestock suffer like this without taking action, but it does nothing about publicly-owned wildlife.
2/05/2014 9:15:08 AM

The RSPCA have no credibility when it comes to practical pest management. What use is a bit of paper ?(the only deliverable from the "action plan"). And why the monotonus cry for "more humane" control methods when there are plenty of references (Sharpe & Saunders for one) that clearly show a bullet to be the most humane method already? Ideological bias perhaps?.
2/05/2014 9:41:26 AM

Shooters cant control wild dog populations - but thanks for your loopy comments, weekend warriors.
real gren
2/05/2014 1:49:46 PM

The RSPCA is good at supporting plans and calling for research to get their name in the media and appear to be doing something. Unfortunately they are absent or even getting in the way of real action to stop wild dogs attacking stock. Groups like Animals Australia are even worse.
3/05/2014 4:22:54 AM

The RSPCA is useless along with the latte sipping Green do gooders and Animal Liberation. The effective way is to allow firearm owners to cull them rule 303.
Yosemite Sam
5/05/2014 9:13:27 AM

Research has shown that a multi-pronged coordinated approach is most effective. That can include ground shooting by volunteers, a largely untapped resource in this country due to the ideological agendas of groups such as AA, the Greens, and RSPCA. Recreational hunters don't claim to be the sole answer but would like the opportunity to be part of the solution.
1 | 2  |  next >


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who