ESCAS alternative at pilot stage

25 Jun, 2015 02:00 AM
Achieving outcomes for animal welfare equivalent to ESCAS standards or better

THE animal export sector has been working with other industry groups to develop an alternative system to the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS) - the Livestock Global Assurance Program (LGAP) - which would operate across all Australia’s live export markets, not just Saudi Arabia.

ALEC (Australian Livestock Exporters' Council), MLA (Meat and Livestock Australia) and LiveCorp have all participated in the development of the program.

LGAP is being promoted as a quality assurance (QA) certification scheme which would operate independently of government and at arms-length of industry.

One of the certification system’s key selling points would be achieving outcomes for animal welfare equivalent to ESCAS standards or better, according to World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) requirements.

It would also reduce red-tape costs and bureaucratic interference faced by industry but also deliver greater, positive welfare outcomes by including non-Australian originated animals in foreign supply chains and facilities, like feedlots and abattoirs.

Future proofing live export

A webinar on the LGAP system says its design is being driven by industry to develop a QA certification system underpinned by best-practice animal welfare, according to OIE guidelines.

It would refine the ESCAS system and make it more “sustainable” and “future proof” the live export industry, after the animal welfare regime was implemented in the wake of the 2011 Indonesian live cattle suspension over six weeks at “break-neck speed”.

LGAP would also be underpinned by auditing standards, according to the ISO 17065 system, which is the world’s best-practice model for certification bodies operating product verification systems.

It’s understood a pilot of the proposed LGAP system is set to be launched in coming weeks in three existing ESCAS-approved supply chains, in three different markets over three months.

Results from the pilot program are due to be used in refining the final model which is then due to be handed over to ALEC, MLA and LiveCorp by December 2015 or early 2016.

It’s understood LGAP would ultimately require legislative changes in federal parliament.

However, the Abbott government may be reluctant to raise any legislation without a guarantee of Labor’s support, to avoid picking a potentially volatile political fight once the pilot LGAP model is complete, especially with a federal election looming.

MLA has also called for expressions of interest from potential certification bodies to participate in the pilot scheme.

Facilities will be rated according to animal welfare risk and those that are ESCAS compliant are expected to meet the scheme’s requirements.

Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


25/06/2015 8:12:41 AM

The logical way to implement ethical slaughter in Indonesia and other livestock imports from Australia is to co-partner new slaughter facilities. If this was funded from exporter levies and staff from australia trained and supervised Indonesians a vast improvement would result. Further the Australian Government could be encouraged to give aid assistance in kind instead of cash. Unless this happens expect more reports of animal cruelty.
26/06/2015 7:29:42 AM

Realist you need to get up to date. What your wanting has been operating for several years now. Over 7000 people in the importing countries have been trained by Australians to date. Training has included stock handling, feedlot management and abattoir best practices. In addition stunning equipment has been introduced, and in many instances supplied , and is being used in all import countries.
Katrina Love
27/06/2015 4:14:47 PM

That's incorrect, Dash - whilst stunning equipment has been supplied and is used for Australian animals (and others) in Indonesia (90% stun rate) and Vietnam (100% stun rate IF not leaked from ESCAS-approved facilities), stunning is not carried out in Kuwait, Egypt (electric stunning has been discussed), Israel, Turkey, Oman, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar, Mauritius and a few others I've forgotten.
27/06/2015 10:07:56 PM

ESCAS as we have seen time and time again is a cruel joke. We have no control in importing countries and should not be sending live animals particularly when there are other options that better support local employment and animal welfare.


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who