Wally's Piggery cruelty charges dropped

20 Nov, 2014 09:35 AM
Comments
11
 
RSPCA NSW and lawyers acting for Wally’s Piggery have agreed to discontinue proceedings

ANIMAL cruelty charges in the high profile NSW case against Wally’s Piggery have been dismissed, with prosecution hindered due to unlawfully obtained video footage.

RSPCA NSW and lawyers acting for Wally’s Piggery agreed to discontinue proceedings, with each party bearing their own costs.

The matter appeared in the Yass Local Court on Monday before Magistrate Mrs G Beattie, who dismissed the case when charges were withdrawn by the prosecutors, RSPCA NSW.

Wally’s Piggery, about 20 minutes from Canberra at Murrumbateman, NSW, was facing charges relating to video footage obtained in 2012 by animal rights activists from covert filming operations, reportedly taken over three months.

Media exposure of Wally’s Piggery led to 53 animal cruelty charges being laid after pigs were seen being beaten with a sledgehammer along with other horrific vision.

The incident ignited a spate of similar covert filming operations on piggeries throughout Australia, after Animal Liberation ACT and NSW approached ACT-based animal rights activist and website designer Chris Delforce.

Mr Delforce launched various internet sites - Aussie Pigs and Aussie Farms - to publish covert video footage, targeting intensive farming practices with specific focus on pork production.

That campaign has sparked calls for tougher regulations, including that of federal Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce, to prevent animal rights activists trespassing and withholding video evidence for extended periods, while potentially causing biosecurity risks.

Owners of the now defunct piggery had planned to fight the animal cruelty charges and had entered not guilty pleas, it was reported.

Canberra lawyer Richard Thomas, representing Wally’s Piggery, has been contacted for comment by Fairfax Media.

RSPCA NSW said it was disappointed at having to make a very difficult decision on November 17 this year, to withdraw its prosecution against WSL Investments Pty Ltd, Wally Perenc and Stephanie Perenc (commonly referred to as Wally’s Piggery).

“The RSPCA NSW investigation of this matter arose as a result of footage that has been widely circulated on the internet,” a statement said.

“We are disappointed that this footage was not lawfully substantiated by Aussie Pigs and/or Animal Liberation, who initially released the footage to the media instead of giving it directly to one of the enforcement agencies.

“Those responsible for capturing the images subsequently would not provide a statement to RSPCA NSW so none of the evidence released by them could be used in the prosecution.”

The statement also said there appeared to be a common misconception that the case at Yass Local Court related to the widely circulated footage.

“This is not correct,” the statement said.

“The RSPCA NSW’s case in this matter sought to rely on its inspectors' observations and those of other agencies, and an expert, when they attended in early August 2012, and not the widely distributed video footage.

“The decision taken by the RSPCA NSW on November 17 was made in accordance with its duties as a prosecutor and after consultation with independent Counsel appearing for the RSPCA NSW.

“This is a disappointing result all round given the extensive efforts of the RSPCA to bring this matter before the court.

“RSPCA NSW implores any person who witnesses or obtains evidence of animal cruelty to report it to the relevant authority immediately.”

A spokesperson for the NSW Department of Primary Industries also expressed disappointment at the charges being dropped.

“In July 2013, RSPCA NSW laid charges against Wally’s Piggery relating to the treatment and management of pigs at their Murrumbateman piggery,” the spokesperson said.

“The charges were laid after investigation of the piggery following release of video footage which showed mistreatment of pigs.

“Those responsible for capturing the images would not provide a statement so none of the evidence released by them could be used in the prosecution.

“On November 17 the decision was made to withdraw the prosecution after consultation with independent Counsel, based on matters relating to legal evidence.

“The piggery has been de-stocked and is no longer in operation.”

Situation 'suspicious': Delforce

Mr Delforce said the RSPCA must be held accountable, “for what they have and have not done”.

“How can they blame their withdrawal of the charges against Wally Perenc on the refusal of the activists who obtained the footage to put themselves in danger, while at the same time acknowledging that the 53 charges of cruelty had nothing to do with that footage and were based solely on their own investigations?” he said.

“How can they blatantly lie about footage being given to the media first, when in fact the footage was not released publicly until after the RSPCA had conducted an investigation?

“How stupid do they think people are?”

Mr Delforce said he believed the situation was “very suspicious”.

“Anyone who has information about any deals the RSPCA may have made with Wally outside of the courtroom are urged to come forward,” he said.

“Never has the notion of RSPCA being run by farmers for farmers rung truer.

“There will be a rally held shortly in Sydney, Canberra or both; we will not let them - Wally or the RSPCA - get away with this.”

Animal Liberation NSW has been contacted for comment but did not respond before deadline.

Page:
1
FarmOnline
Colin Bettles

Colin Bettles

is the national political writer for Fairfax Agricultural Media
Date: Newest first | Oldest first

READER COMMENTS

Seriously?
20/11/2014 1:01:47 PM

Seriously Coin? Your article is hell bent on blaming the widely circulated footage for the charges being dropped, when you have actually quoted the RSPCA saying that is not the case?
pam
20/11/2014 1:36:01 PM

Pathetic RSPCA, pathetic animal welfare laws , absolutely disgusted and until the time when "producers" of animal "products" have live stream CCTV how on earth are we to know what goes on behind the walls.
bronwyn
20/11/2014 1:36:09 PM

It sounds like the animal activists were caught out with malpractice of their own lending weight to the conclusion that just like most of their claims this one was without proper foundation. Bring on legislation protecting farmers from more of the same.
Chris
20/11/2014 2:27:53 PM

Bronwyn, this article is about the RSPCA withdrawing the case from court, a case relating specifically to their own investigations into the piggery, it has nothing to do with the activists who obtained the footage. Maybe take a look at the footage for yourself at aussiepigs.com before defending it and encouraging even further secrecy in this industry.
Reality
20/11/2014 6:47:23 PM

We will keep pushing until farmers have rigorous regulations, daily livestock inspections and audits and it must all be paid for out of the the farmers pockets.
Joe
21/11/2014 7:53:05 AM

Bronwyn, have you seen you footage? You really look like a villain with a comment like that after such horrible unpunished abuses by this farmer. No one should be okay with this guy getting let off.
Natural Justice
21/11/2014 10:52:48 AM

There are always arguments for action against alleged animal cruelty. The activists supposedly obtained actual footage of animal cruelty. They also made this footage available to the pubic. If the footage was real, then why would they not give a statement and enable to footage to enter the judicial process. This raises reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the footage. Does it not.
Cattle Advocate
24/11/2014 6:05:19 PM

When PETA with 3M donors attacked our wool industry telling the world not to buy wool, it didn't present one witness for RSPCA to use for the prosecution. If you want justice after seeing a crime you give evidence in court, or has AR activism become a law unto itself? Magistrate Peter Dare called for mediation after Edwina Beveridge asked for a AVO after the 2013 AR attacks on her piggery. PD: ''This woman just wants to be left alone. I'll be surprised if i see either of you back but we'll take it from there if we do''.
Ted O'Brien.
14/12/2014 5:56:38 PM

Nobody kicks a cow in the head. All that will get you is a broken foot, and that without causing the cow any great discomfort. Yet 4 Corners ran a video showing a bloke kicking at a cow's head, and the Gillard/Brown government bankrupted a large number of cattle producers on the basis of that video.
Jody
28/12/2014 10:05:46 PM

pathetic Ted O'Brien, I'm sure if someone kicked you in the head you would feel it and expect justice!!. You have no idea about animal cruelty.
1 | 2  |  next >

POST A COMMENT


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *
 

COMMENTS

light grey arrow
I'm one of the people who want marijuana to be legalized, some city have been approved it but
light grey arrow
#blueysmegacarshowandcruise2019 10 years on Daniels Ute will be apart of another massive cause.
light grey arrow
Australia's live animal trade is nothing but a blood stained industry that suits those who