It's been a serious year for farmer spending as upbeat commodity markets and better seasons prompt widespread big budget upgrades of machinery and farm infrastructure.
Yet producers are still showing plenty of enthusiasm to use farm management deposits to save money for tougher times, with the National Farmers Federation wanting a $800,000 cap on FMD accounts scrapped to help enhance the culture of sensible saving, drought preparedness and business resilience.
NFF also wants FMD qualification restrictions eased so more farmers with strategic off-farm earnings can hold accounts.
After a turnaround in seasonal conditions across much of eastern Australia, many farmers have milked their FMD savings during 2020-21 to pay for post-drought restocking and equipment upgrades.
Their spending plans have been further motivated by attractive tax depreciation incentives from Canberra encouraging capital equipment investment throughout the economy.
National Australia Bank's regional and agribusiness executive Julie Rynski said boom conditions and positive outlook for many rural sectors were reflected in the bank's latest lending and FMD data.
NAB's total agribusiness loan book had grown 8.4 per cent year-on-year to $31 billion, while the bank's share of Australia's farm sector lending market was now more than 31pc.
Farm equipment lending was a standout statistic for NAB - up 132pc.
Time to spend, and save
She said strong agricultural market returns provided an ideal opportunity for farmers to both invest in infrastructure and equipment and to replenish FMD accounts before the end of the financial year.
"Agribusiness is a very sophisticated business sector and risk management is certainly a priority for many of our customers," Ms Rynski said.
"FMDs let producers set aside pre-tax income in the good years, which is then available as a cash flow management tool for lower production years.
"As the financial year's end approaches we're encouraging FMD holders to discuss their position with their financial advisers."
At the end of March there were $5.26b in FMD deposits.
The total had dropped more than $1.2b in nine months, reflecting a significant run of withdrawals to cover recent post-drought spending initiatives.
The last time FMD levels were down to $5.2b was in March 2018.
However, that total quickly jumped to $6.6b by June 2018 and then hit an all time high of $6.7b in June 2019 before drought conditions started eroding savings activity.
"There's no doubt FMDs are being used to help build resilience in the agricultural system," said NFF chief economist Ash Salardini.
"They provide an important avenue for producers to save for bad days, which is exactly what government drought policy wants farmers to do."
Twenty years ago only about $600m was held in FMDs, invested by 23,000 account holders. Today about 44,000 farmers use the risk management accounts.
However, the NFF is frustrated some FMD rules discourage farmers from going further with their drought preparedness and sustainability plans.
Scrap the cap
Mr Salardini noted the $800,000 cap on accounts effectively penalised high volume, low margin farming enterprises, notably grain growers in grainbelt districts where big paying crop seasons may arrive only twice a decade, often to be followed by three, four or five years when little or no crop was harvested at all.
As climatic conditions were growing more unpredictable, salting away as much income as possible in those big seasons would become increasingly important to surviving the tough years and fluctuating market trends which accompanied them.
"Drought doesn't just cause a climatic impact on farm businesses, it also triggers highly volatile market trends which deliver income highs and lows at unexpected times," he said.
"Given FMDs provide an important way to manage that combination of seasonal and financial extremes there seems no real logic in an arbitrary cap on how much income should be saved."
- Govt committed to FMDs, but asks do they work?
- FMDs down as drought bites, but many farmers add to savings
An NFF submission into a current review of the FMD system argued only a small percentage of accounts actually reached the $800,000 ceiling in recent years, which suggested the sector was not misusing the term deposits for tax avoidance.
"We can understand governments being cautious about losing potential tax income if you had a lot of accounts with $800,000 balances, but that's not the case," Mr Salardini said.
NFF is also frustrated with the off-farm income threshold which prohibits farmers who diversify their farm enterprise with outside revenue streams including earnings from vegetation or biodiversity offset credits generated from paddocks set aside from agricultural production.
Farmers with total off-farm incomes of $100,000 are unable to put their farm earnings into FMDs.
Mr Salardini said the ruling was "surprisingly counterintuitive" given producers wanting to bolster the sustainability of their farm environment and their business resilience were penalised for having a second job or non-conventional earnings providing cash flow in good and bad years.
"We want governments to support best practice strategies across all levels of drought preparedness," he said.
Canberra's review of the FMD scheme received submissions throughout the farm and finance sectors, attracting 200 responses alone from a questionnaire seeking opinions from farmers.
Start the day with all the big news in agriculture! Sign up below to receive our daily Farmonline newsletter.
The story Big spending year highlights post-drought value of FMDs to farms first appeared on Farm Online.