It's time to stop milking farmers

It’s time to stop milking farmers


Comment by Ian Lane, managing director Scibus

Dairy farmers are feeling the bleeding edge of deregulation and globalisation in agriculture.


COLES' and Aldi's decision to follow Woolworths and abandon $1 a litre milk represents a small, but powerful step towards addressing a marked decline in farmer returns.

Dairy farmers are feeling the bleeding edge of deregulation and globalisation in agriculture.

While concepts of trading on level playing fields are laudable, the experience of the past 30 years is that protection in Europe and the United States will not be readily dismantled.

It is naïve to expect this situation will change in a time frame consistent with maintaining a viable dairy industry in Australia.

Australian milk producers compete locally against subsidised cheese and dairy products from the European Union, US and other places.

We have allowed export milk prices set in corrupted markets to determine the price of whole milk in unsubidised Australia.

With only 30 per cent of Australia's milk exported, the tail is wagging the dog.

Valuing milk at an export price into the internal markets results in a loss of viability of dairy producers.

Since fresh milk market deregulation in 2000 returns to producers in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania have been essentially zero.

There has been marked volatility, with farmers profiting some years, but making big losses in others.

These outcomes were predictable.

I noted in 2000 a "marked downward pressure on market prices for whole milk through the concentration of purchasing power in supermarket chains".

"The effects of these changes on individual producers are to accelerate trends towards larger farms, high production per cow and more intensive management of cattle," I noted at the time.

"Less obvious changes may include rural poverty."

Fast forward to 2019 and many dairy producers have diminished viability with fewer, larger, but less profitable farms.

In 1983, dairy producers in all States had more than 90 per cent equity, except Victoria which had about 88pc.

Now only about 33pc of Victorian farms remain and they average less than 66pc equity.

The impact of $1/litre on producers was discounted by the Australian Consumer Competition Commission, but this price has not been indexed in eight years.

The severe initial effect is much worse.

Further, large contracts offered by supermarket chains to milk processors have led to low tenders, resulting in farmers receiving prices below costs of production.

Export milk product production was once based on seasonal production from pasture in areas with predictable rainfall.

By contrast, whole milk is of highest quality, it's fresh, available all year and costs more to produce.

Traditionally, better returns for whole milk allowed some producers to maintain cows to take advantage of good seasonal conditions to produce milk for export.

Pricing milk on an export parity-basis erodes a strong base to support export.

While not all the collapse in milk production since 2011 can be attributed to $1/litre milk, declining production and profits and fewer farm numbers are not coincidental.

Importantly, there are increasing demands for animal protein and it is vital to identify ways to ensure there are sufficient producers to meet future demand.

Some steps may help rejuvenate the industry.

The promised mandatory code of conduct between farmers and processors is essential.

Bargaining groups are needed to equilibrate power in negotiation.

A floor price for whole milk based on production costs rather than a corrupted export price is also needed.

The price for whole milk and milk products produced and consumed within the country should reflect nutritional and other values of milk and could allow manufacturers and exporters to maintain infrastructure and milk throughput necessary to access export markets.

Ideally, forward pricing would allow some certainty in planning to reflect the biological cycles in cattle production.

It takes about three years to raise a calf to herd entry.

Highly volatile markets put producers at risk if they choose to expand a herd and then milk prices collapse.

Agricultural businesses should be robust enough to successfully plan for debt, drought, fire or flood and to cope with burgeoning regulation.

To continue with the same approaches that clearly failed for 20 years is to court a loss of food security, destruction of rural communities and less employment.

Our farmers are not being rewarded for the world-leading quality of the food produced.

The consumer should not benefit from a corrupted market and lack of negotiating power leading to unsustainable pricing.

But neither should producer returns be feather-bedded.

It is time to accept the market is not a plan and time for leadership in developing new plans.


From the front page

Sponsored by