GOVERNMENT intervention in markets tends to end up with unintended consequences which cause pain.
These are just some examples of how, even though well-intentioned, government intervention in markets tends to result in consequences that cause more pain in the long term.
China has an effective ban on Australian barley - 80.5 per cent tariff will do that.
While many believe that we haven't been impacted, we definitely have - most of our malt export market is gone, and other countries are filling the gap with feed and malt.
In Australia, the focus is largely on what the price is doing locally.
It is, however, worthwhile to keep a close eye on what is happening within our competitiveness overseas.
We have been working lately with AgFlow, a relatively new entrant into ag data provision based out of Geneva.
The chart (right) is a combination of the cost of purchase from the grower, the loading onto a vessel and the freight to the world's two main barley destinations (Saudi Arabia and China).
This gives an insight into what price it would cost for either Saudi Arabia or China to purchase from the four main origins for this season.
As you can see, the Australian price is substantially lower into both destinations, this is due to our lower purchase price.
Chinese consumers of barley are being forced to buy from origins that are substantially more expensive.
If China was open to us, we would be pricing at a higher level, and China would also be paying less than they presently are.
A win-win situation for Australia and China.
Unfortunately, geopolitics doesn't always operate in a logical fashion.
As long as grain prices overall remain strong, it's hard to notice the impact of lower barley pricing in Australia.
We are however heavily discounted.
Want weekly news highlights delivered to your inbox? Sign up to the Farm Weekly newsletter.
Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.